Skip to main content

The game of justice

Manufactured enemies

Crimes against humanity that we are witness to in our day can roughly be divided into three categories. Crimes which are not qualified as such, not punished and not judicially processed. Crimes which, in contrary, are qualified as such, punished and processed in some form or another, but judicially is not quite the term that seems to fit the description. And, finally, crimes against humanity which are completely disregarded by everyone except those they are perpetrated against, given that they are not committed within the interest sphere of any one power.

The justification for the first type of crime usually lies in the second type. They are often of a much larger scale than the second and the rational for them, more precisely, excuse given, is self defense.

Take the example of 9/11. Approximately 3000 people were killed in a day in the most horrifying way imaginable while they were quietly getting on with business in their offices. This crime was qualified by the entire world (except the maniacs who committed it) as a crime against humanity. Punishment followed and its perpetrators are still being processed.

The punishment or response was the raising to the ground of two countries. The BBC reported several days ago that there are 700.000 widows in Iraq. In Afghanistan no one seems to be too concerned with the death toll.

The laying of the ground for crimes against humanity for political purposes is a very simple process, repeated over and over in history, and can be termed as the production of the enemy. Once a group or government successfully produces a credible enemy there is no end in sight to the crimes it can commit. One doesn't have to look far back in history to understand this simple process very clearly. One just has to remember Hitler's "love affair" with the Jews. But, one also has to bear in mind, that the production of the enemy is a very dangerous process in as much as it can backfire. It has a tendency to rally entire groups of nations against its perpetrators.

It would seem that crimes against humanity can only successfully be prevented by those in whose name they are being committed, namely for whose alleged benefit and safety they are being carried out.

One would assume that the production of the enemy is such a simple process that a three year old might understand it and see through it. However, its effectiveness and power seem to lie precisely in its simplicity.


N.P.

Comments

Philip Hall said…
Sign your name - or your nick.
Philip Hall said…
I agree that it scapegoating is a trick people should see through easily - but, mysteriously, they don't.

Popular posts from this blog

A warm welcome

. Why blog on ARS NOTORIA? I have set up this website,  ARS NOTORIA ,  (the notable art) as an opportunity for like-minded people like you to jot down your thoughts and share them with us on what I hope will be a high profile blog. . ARS NOTORIA is conceived as an outlet: a way for you to get things off your chest, shake those bees out of your bonnet and scratch that itch. The idea is that you do so in a companionable blogging environment, one that that is less structured - freer. Every article you care to write or photograph or picture you care to post will appear on its own page and you are pretty much guaranteed that people will read with interest what you produce and take time to look at what you post. Personal blogs are OK, but what we long for, if we can admit it, are easy-going, loose knit communities: blogging hubs where we can share ideas and pop in and out as frequently, or as seldom, as we like. You will be able to moderate and delete any of the comments made on 

Phil Hall: The Taleban are a drug cartel disguised as an Islamist movement

Truly the Taleban could have arranged as many bombings and terrorists acts as they liked in the UK. There are many Pashtun young men and women in cities in the UK who still have large extended families back in Afghanistan and who could be forced into doing something they should not. But guess what. So far there have been no attacks by Afghans on British soil. Why? It is a mystery. News comes from Afghanistan and the recent UN report that the Taleban and the drug trade are intertwined and that now the Taleban, who are mainly Pashtun, are officially in command of an international drug cartel.  News comes from Afghanistan that Taleban drug lords go to Dubai to live high on the hog and gamble and sleep with women and luxuriate in all the that the freedom to consume has to offer, while their footsoldiers, peasant fighters, are deluded and told that they are fighting a patriotic religious war.  And though they are told they are fighting a religious war what really matters to them in tr

Our Collective Caliban

At the risk of seeming digitally provincial, I’m going to illustrate my point with an example from a recent Guardian blog. Michel Ruse, who is apparently a philosopher, suggested that, whilst disagreeing with creationists on all points, and agreeing with Dawkins et al on both their science and philosophy, it might be wiser and more humane (humanist, even) not to vilify the religious as cretinous and incapable of reason. Which seems reasonable, to me. According to many below-the-line responses he is a ‘half-baked’ atheist, ‘one of the more strident and shrill New Apologists’ and, apparently, “needs to get a pair’. And that’s just from the first twenty comments. A recent article by a screenwriter at a US site was titled ‘Why I Won’t Read Your Fucking Screenplay.’ Tough guy. I wonder how his Christmas cards read. I’m going to sound like a maiden aunt dismayed by an unsporting bridge play and can perhaps be accused of needing to ‘get a pair’ myself (although, before you