Skip to main content

Join the Communist University


Domza at NUMSA 2009, photo by Patrick Bond


What is Marxism relevant to? Who is it relevant to? For what purpose is it relevant?


Dear readers of ARS NOTORIA,

How wonderful that there are young students of Marx out there in the readership!

What is Marxism relevant to? Who is it relevant to? For what purpose is it relevant?

Is there even such a thing as Marxism? Marx didn't think so, and nor did Cyril Smith, who is quite usefully erudite on this question (see the Cyril Smith archive on Marxists Internet Archive).

The question "Marxism is as relevant today as it ever was" implies an a priori intentionality and a deliberate subjectivity. If it is a question you are asking then that is encouraging.

Marxism would not be relevant if history had ended, The Subject had died, and post-modernism continued to waive the rules of philosophy.

The first kind of reading list I can offer is the (currently) eight "Generic Courses" of the Communist University, which are linked from the home page of the Communist University e-mail distribution Google Group at:

http://groups-beta.google.com/group/communist-university/web/basics---index.

The CU has been going since 2003 and it has become more systematic as time has gone on. I am still refining these "Generic Courses", and also intend to complete two more. The last two will be one on "Capital" Volumes 2 & 3, and one on selected parts of Hegel.

___________________________

Marxism would not be relevant if history had ended, The Subject had died, and post-modernism continued to waive the rules of philosophy.
___________________________

Apart from the "basics", what you might consider looking at would be the one on Capital Volume 1, Lenin's State and Revolution, and the last set on Philosophy and Religion. It is in the realm of philosophy that you will have to find the answer to the question, in my opinion.

The way these "Generic Courses" are arranged is in three layers. There are my "Introductions" which for this purpose may be used as a quick outline or crib. They were originally my blogs, motivating form people to read and discuss the main texts, which are the next layer. The third layer is supplementary or additional texts.

The texts are short. Some come from books and many of the books come from the Marxists Internet Archive.

If you read the first of the first, which is about Paulo Freire and Tony Buzan, you will see that I don't recommend people reading stuff in literal order or alone. Reading should also be intentional and the way to learn is by discussion.
________________________________

The bottom line of Marxism is freedom. The general theory of freedom is humanism, and Marxism is the most developed humanism. It is the humanism of our times.
________________________________

There is a discussion forum for the Young Communist League of South Africa which is a good way to get a feeling of the relevance of Marxism to young black South Africans.

It's pretty vital to be able to handle lots of e-mail. I have mine set up to be sorted automatically into about 90 headings (using Gmail's "Labels"). This way I can prioritise my reading and read much more systematically, and also "mark as read" quite safely.

The bottom line of Marxism is freedom. The general theory of freedom is humanism, and Marxism is the most developed humanism. It is the humanism of our times.

If you visit the website and post me your email I can subscribe you to the Communist University e-mail list. And if you are younger I would like to subscribe you, with your permission, to the YCLSA discussion forum.

Then we can take it from there. Feel free to discuss.

Best,

VC

(I am the VC, a.k.a. Domza)
Labels:

Comments

DomzaNet said…
Photo taken by Patrick Bond, FYI.
Tuesday, 27 April, 2010
Philip Hall said…
Corrected it Dom. Thanks again. Thanks for your help with Natalie's dissertation.
Tuesday, 27 April, 2010
DomzaNet said…
Help! I didn't mean to change it! It was correct before. It's just a curious thing that this photo was taken by Patrick Bond. And FYI was to mean "for your information".
Tuesday, 27 April, 2010
Philip Hall said…
Oh. Consider it undone.
Tuesday, 27 April, 2010
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

A warm welcome

. Why blog on ARS NOTORIA? I have set up this website,  ARS NOTORIA ,  (the notable art) as an opportunity for like-minded people like you to jot down your thoughts and share them with us on what I hope will be a high profile blog. . ARS NOTORIA is conceived as an outlet: a way for you to get things off your chest, shake those bees out of your bonnet and scratch that itch. The idea is that you do so in a companionable blogging environment, one that that is less structured - freer. Every article you care to write or photograph or picture you care to post will appear on its own page and you are pretty much guaranteed that people will read with interest what you produce and take time to look at what you post. Personal blogs are OK, but what we long for, if we can admit it, are easy-going, loose knit communities: blogging hubs where we can share ideas and pop in and out as frequentl...
6 comments
Read more

Phil Hall: The Taleban are a drug cartel disguised as an Islamist movement

Truly the Taleban could have arranged as many bombings and terrorists acts as they liked in the UK. There are many Pashtun young men and women in cities in the UK who still have large extended families back in Afghanistan and who could be forced into doing something they should not. But guess what. So far there have been no attacks by Afghans on British soil. Why? It is a mystery. News comes from Afghanistan and the recent UN report that the Taleban and the drug trade are intertwined and that now the Taleban, who are mainly Pashtun, are officially in command of an international drug cartel.  News comes from Afghanistan that Taleban drug lords go to Dubai to live high on the hog and gamble and sleep with women and luxuriate in all the that the freedom to consume has to offer, while their footsoldiers, peasant fighters, are deluded and told that they are fighting a patriotic religious war.  And though they are told they are fighting a religious war what really matters to t...
21 comments
Read more

Our Collective Caliban

At the risk of seeming digitally provincial, I’m going to illustrate my point with an example from a recent Guardian blog. Michel Ruse, who is apparently a philosopher, suggested that, whilst disagreeing with creationists on all points, and agreeing with Dawkins et al on both their science and philosophy, it might be wiser and more humane (humanist, even) not to vilify the religious as cretinous and incapable of reason. Which seems reasonable, to me. According to many below-the-line responses he is a ‘half-baked’ atheist, ‘one of the more strident and shrill New Apologists’ and, apparently, “needs to get a pair’. And that’s just from the first twenty comments. A recent article by a screenwriter at a US site was titled ‘Why I Won’t Read Your Fucking Screenplay.’ Tough guy. I wonder how his Christmas cards read. I’m going to sound like a maiden aunt dismayed by an unsporting bridge play and can perhaps be accused of needing to ‘get a pair’ myself (although, before you...
14 comments
Read more