Skip to main content

'SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT' OR WHITE ELEPHANT? TENERIFE'S RAIL RING

SANTA CRUZ DE TENERIFE, Monday April 12 2010
PHOTO: Cabildo economy minister Carlos Alonso (third from left) marking a minute's silence for Polish president Lech Kaczynski and other government officials killed in the weekend's Smolensk plane crash on Monday.
TENERIFE'S government demanded central state funding for its planned railway on Monday as the scheme came under renewed fire.
by JAMES TWEEDIE
Tenerife Cabildo vice-president and economy and competitiveness minister Carlos Alonso announced that his nationalist Canarian Coalition (CC) party had presented a motion calling on the Socialist Party (PSOE) federal government to set aside money from its Plan Extraordinario de Infraestructuras (PEI) for the northern branch of the Anillo Ferroviario rail ring.
The document charged that central government funding of rail schemes in the Canaries had been “historically non-existent,” although it conceded that Madrid had part-financed the recently-completed Santa Cruz-La Laguna Tranvia tram network.
Speaking at his weekly press conference an hour later, PSOE regional parliamentary spokesman Santiago Pérez described the motion as “more propaganda” from the CC and insisted that the government had honoured its funding commitments to the region.
Mr Alonso responded to criticism of the project from United Left (IU) Tenerife spokesman Ramón Trujillo, who argued last week that rather than enhancing the public transport system, the railway would compete with existing bus routes while some 84 per cent of journeys would still be made by car.
Mr Alonso insisted that the the scheme would not pit trains against buses, and that the two transport modes would form an integrated system along with private taxis.
Mr Trujillo wrote that the €1.24 billion rail ring was a white elephant, which would cost more than three times as much as improving the bus service and creating dedicated bus lanes.
He pointed out the railway will have higher operating costs than buses, which make a loss of 55 cents per passenger journey – more than half the fare on metropolitan routes.
Meanwhile, Mr Trujillo said, the number of cars on the island had risen by 276,000 in the decade from 1997 to 2007 – from 630 per thousand inhabitants to 804, compared with the national average of 648.
He accused local, island and regional governments of acting against their own guidelines in building more roads and car parks and thus encouraging people to drive to work, often from one municipality to another.
Two railway lines are initially planned to run from the capital Santa Cruz along the north and south coasts of the island.
The southern line will continue up the shorter west coast to Fonsalía in Guia de Isora.
The northern route will only reach as far as Los Realejos, but the Cabildo hopes to extend it to Icod de Los Vinos and on to Adeje, thus completing the anillo or ring.
Construction of the network could employ up to 4,000 workers, but the completed railway would need only 200 permanent staff.
However, the plan remains unpopular in many quarters. Residents and environmentalists have voiced concerns that the railway's construction will require the expropriation and demolition of many homes and will encroach upon the habitats of endangered species.
The Cabildo has sought to play down these fears, insisting that much of the railway will follow the routes of existing motorways or tunnel beneath the landscape.

Comments

Philip Hall said…
But isn't rail inherently more ecofriendly and sustainable?
James Tweedie said…
That would seem reasonable. That's why I didn't understand the local Greens' objection to it. But the project could just be a way to channel public money into the pockets of local businesspeople - the same people who control the Cabildo.

The Cabildo owns a lot of enterprises, including a brand-new golf course in the most remote part of the island which is basically just for tourists. They are paying 500,000 Euros to host the 10th Tenerife Ladies Golf Tournament there to promote it. And my local council pays to have the bins emptied every night. It's state monopoly capitalism on a local scale.

Popular posts from this blog

A warm welcome

. Why blog on ARS NOTORIA? I have set up this website,  ARS NOTORIA ,  (the notable art) as an opportunity for like-minded people like you to jot down your thoughts and share them with us on what I hope will be a high profile blog. . ARS NOTORIA is conceived as an outlet: a way for you to get things off your chest, shake those bees out of your bonnet and scratch that itch. The idea is that you do so in a companionable blogging environment, one that that is less structured - freer. Every article you care to write or photograph or picture you care to post will appear on its own page and you are pretty much guaranteed that people will read with interest what you produce and take time to look at what you post. Personal blogs are OK, but what we long for, if we can admit it, are easy-going, loose knit communities: blogging hubs where we can share ideas and pop in and out as frequentl...

Phil Hall: The Taleban are a drug cartel disguised as an Islamist movement

Truly the Taleban could have arranged as many bombings and terrorists acts as they liked in the UK. There are many Pashtun young men and women in cities in the UK who still have large extended families back in Afghanistan and who could be forced into doing something they should not. But guess what. So far there have been no attacks by Afghans on British soil. Why? It is a mystery. News comes from Afghanistan and the recent UN report that the Taleban and the drug trade are intertwined and that now the Taleban, who are mainly Pashtun, are officially in command of an international drug cartel.  News comes from Afghanistan that Taleban drug lords go to Dubai to live high on the hog and gamble and sleep with women and luxuriate in all the that the freedom to consume has to offer, while their footsoldiers, peasant fighters, are deluded and told that they are fighting a patriotic religious war.  And though they are told they are fighting a religious war what really matters to t...

Our Collective Caliban

At the risk of seeming digitally provincial, I’m going to illustrate my point with an example from a recent Guardian blog. Michel Ruse, who is apparently a philosopher, suggested that, whilst disagreeing with creationists on all points, and agreeing with Dawkins et al on both their science and philosophy, it might be wiser and more humane (humanist, even) not to vilify the religious as cretinous and incapable of reason. Which seems reasonable, to me. According to many below-the-line responses he is a ‘half-baked’ atheist, ‘one of the more strident and shrill New Apologists’ and, apparently, “needs to get a pair’. And that’s just from the first twenty comments. A recent article by a screenwriter at a US site was titled ‘Why I Won’t Read Your Fucking Screenplay.’ Tough guy. I wonder how his Christmas cards read. I’m going to sound like a maiden aunt dismayed by an unsporting bridge play and can perhaps be accused of needing to ‘get a pair’ myself (although, before you...