Skip to main content

Hammond, Clarkson and May are racists

The BBC appeals to the Klu Klux Klan demographic


Three racist Cocks
“Why would you want a Mexican car? Because cars reflect national characteristics don’t they,” Hammond said. “Mexican cars are just going to be lazy, feckless, flatulent, overweight, leaning against a fence asleep looking at a cactus with a blanket with a hole in the middle on as a coat.”

Richard Hammond

And then Clarkson stepped in to support and reinforce Hammond, who continued, referring to Mexican food as 'refried sick'.Clarkson said the Mexican ambassador would be to lazy to complain. Answering to criticisms after the programme, Hammond was facetious. 'It can't be racist, we're the factual programme of the year.'

Now this could be seen to be funny. But the truth is it is deeply sinister. It is deeply sinister because one of the major consumers of Top Gear are punters in the United States. And when people in the United States are prejudiced against Mexicans they don't just make jokes about long moustaches. They go further.

They introduce racist laws like the racial profiling law in Arizona.

Racism against Mexican Americans and Mexicans in the United States is no laughing matter. The anti-Mexican and Mexican sentiment in the US among white racist groupings are on a par with the racism of the EDL in Britain and the BNP against Islam.

It was a cheap jibe calculated to win the sympathy of the BBCs target market in the US. Obviously the BBC calculated that making racist comments about Mexicans would endear them to a certain demographic in the US.

The truth about everything that happens on Top Gear, as Jeremy Clarkson has explained, is that it is scripted and choreographed. It is far less spontaneous than it comes across on TV. If racist jokes were planned against Mexicans then they were done so for a reason. With the authorisation of the BBC.
___________________________________________________________

It was a cheap jibe calculated to win the sympathy of the BBCs target market in the US. Obviously the BBC calculated that making racist comments about Mexicans would endear them to a certain unpleasant car owning demographic in the US.
__________________________________________________________

Now in my view this is far more serious than the Jonathon Ross and Russell Brand fracas. The moral bankruptcy of the BBC will be exposed when absolutely nothing of any consequence happens to the cash cow or its presenters. What we will get is a snide and insincere apology and Top Gear and the BBC will quickly move on.

I suggest that if Richard Hammond and Jeremy Clarkson and Top Gear producers and BBC apparatchiks think it is safe to denigrate Mexicans and reinforce dangerous cultural stereotypes in the hope that they will reach the racist demographic that other people do not reach in the US and be considered 'Good 'ol boys' then they be subjected to some of the techniques used for re-education in Guantanamo suggested by the CIA Kubark manual.

I suggest Ranchero music played at a very high volume while the Top Gear presenters and producers and BBC executives watch endless hours of the beatings given to Mexican immigrants by US border police projected on their cell walls.

And if they can come out after a week of that still smiling and making racist jokes then I'll be surprised and impressed.


Listen you three Cocks.

The social security system in Mexico means that if you lose your job in Mexico you work to live. The second largest source of external revenue to Mexico are remittences from the US, where hard working Mexican people save and then send their earnings home to their families. If you want a stereotype for lazy selfish bastards, look in the mirror. Look to your own 'bwoken Bwitan'.

Phil Hall

Comment from Judith in Mexico

Como ves Phil? Tu que has vivido en México y que tus hijas son mexicanas? Para nosotros ha sido indignante el comentario de esta bola de IGNORANTES, y que aunque México fuera el país más atrasado del mundo, no tienen ningún derecho de expresarse así de ningún País y menos de nuestro MEXICO LINDO Y QUERIDO.


Translation

What do you think Phil? You who have loved in Mexico and have Mexican daughters? For us the comments from this bunch of IGNORANT idiots have caused great indignation, and even if Mexico were the most backward country in the world they still shouldn't have the right  to expresthemselves that way about any country, least of all our Beatiful and BELOVED Mexico.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

A warm welcome

. Why blog on ARS NOTORIA? I have set up this website,  ARS NOTORIA ,  (the notable art) as an opportunity for like-minded people like you to jot down your thoughts and share them with us on what I hope will be a high profile blog. . ARS NOTORIA is conceived as an outlet: a way for you to get things off your chest, shake those bees out of your bonnet and scratch that itch. The idea is that you do so in a companionable blogging environment, one that that is less structured - freer. Every article you care to write or photograph or picture you care to post will appear on its own page and you are pretty much guaranteed that people will read with interest what you produce and take time to look at what you post. Personal blogs are OK, but what we long for, if we can admit it, are easy-going, loose knit communities: blogging hubs where we can share ideas and pop in and out as frequently, or as seldom, as we like. You will be able to moderate and delete any of the comments made on 

Phil Hall: The Taleban are a drug cartel disguised as an Islamist movement

Truly the Taleban could have arranged as many bombings and terrorists acts as they liked in the UK. There are many Pashtun young men and women in cities in the UK who still have large extended families back in Afghanistan and who could be forced into doing something they should not. But guess what. So far there have been no attacks by Afghans on British soil. Why? It is a mystery. News comes from Afghanistan and the recent UN report that the Taleban and the drug trade are intertwined and that now the Taleban, who are mainly Pashtun, are officially in command of an international drug cartel.  News comes from Afghanistan that Taleban drug lords go to Dubai to live high on the hog and gamble and sleep with women and luxuriate in all the that the freedom to consume has to offer, while their footsoldiers, peasant fighters, are deluded and told that they are fighting a patriotic religious war.  And though they are told they are fighting a religious war what really matters to them in tr

Our Collective Caliban

At the risk of seeming digitally provincial, I’m going to illustrate my point with an example from a recent Guardian blog. Michel Ruse, who is apparently a philosopher, suggested that, whilst disagreeing with creationists on all points, and agreeing with Dawkins et al on both their science and philosophy, it might be wiser and more humane (humanist, even) not to vilify the religious as cretinous and incapable of reason. Which seems reasonable, to me. According to many below-the-line responses he is a ‘half-baked’ atheist, ‘one of the more strident and shrill New Apologists’ and, apparently, “needs to get a pair’. And that’s just from the first twenty comments. A recent article by a screenwriter at a US site was titled ‘Why I Won’t Read Your Fucking Screenplay.’ Tough guy. I wonder how his Christmas cards read. I’m going to sound like a maiden aunt dismayed by an unsporting bridge play and can perhaps be accused of needing to ‘get a pair’ myself (although, before you