Skip to main content

Proposal for a British Investment Corporation - BIC

SKYLON an opportunity for British commercial space development

It seems that all the three main UK parties have one economic thought in common, and that is we do too much finance as a % of our GDP. What nobody seems to agree on is how we as a nation diversify our economy sufficiently so it starts to look more like Germany and less like a club for the city. I thought I would throw out a few ideas to add to the debate:


INVESTMENT

Money is the grease and the engine of the economy. Hence CAPITALism. So how does it get to small, medium sized technology/industrial based enterprises? This has been a deep concern of politicians and economists alike since the banking crisis in 2008. Quantitative Easing has been the most used indirect way of floating the system in capital and thereby hoping that investment ends up in the place it needs to. This works to a degree, but if we want to have a more directed effort the following two solutions are workable:

1 We own big high street banks now, so dictate their investment strategy to the UK. We will after all guarantee them. Politicians have been frightened to do this because they don’t want to be seen as telling the experts what to do. Well the experts aren’t that expert, that’s why we own the things in the first place. Get on and do. There are plenty of decent enterprises that need the cash.

2 You can learn something from everybody. In this case Benito Mussolini. In 1933 the Italian government created the Istituto per la Ricostruzione Industriale (or the IRI for short) it lasted until it was privatised in 1990. By then it was flawed by cronyism, but the concept was secure .So secure the current Italian Economy Minister Giulio Tremonti is thinking of reintroducing it. But what concept is it you ask?
________________________________________________________

You can learn something from everybody. In this case Benito Mussolini. In 1933 the Italian government created the Istituto per la Ricostruzione Industriale
________________________________________________________

The IRI was a sovereign investment fund. It invested in lots of small and medium sized Italian business and raised capital in the international markets because it was big enough to do so and was guaranteed by the Italian state. This kind of Sovereign investment company could work here . It could be used to fund everything from big enterprises like the SKYLON project to widget manufactures in diddy light industrial estate, West Midlands somewhere.

The best thing then is that new industries are invested in by you and me, and when they got big and successful could be floated on the market for a tidy profit. It isn’t only the Italians who are re looking at this model, but the French already have one of a sort called Fond Strategique d’Invsetissement. How about the BRITISH INVESTMENT CORPORATION ( BIC) as a name?

By Mark-in-History

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

A warm welcome

. Why blog on ARS NOTORIA? I have set up this website,  ARS NOTORIA ,  (the notable art) as an opportunity for like-minded people like you to jot down your thoughts and share them with us on what I hope will be a high profile blog. . ARS NOTORIA is conceived as an outlet: a way for you to get things off your chest, shake those bees out of your bonnet and scratch that itch. The idea is that you do so in a companionable blogging environment, one that that is less structured - freer. Every article you care to write or photograph or picture you care to post will appear on its own page and you are pretty much guaranteed that people will read with interest what you produce and take time to look at what you post. Personal blogs are OK, but what we long for, if we can admit it, are easy-going, loose knit communities: blogging hubs where we can share ideas and pop in and out as frequently, or as seldom, as we like. You will be able to moderate and delete any of the comments made on 

Phil Hall: The Taleban are a drug cartel disguised as an Islamist movement

Truly the Taleban could have arranged as many bombings and terrorists acts as they liked in the UK. There are many Pashtun young men and women in cities in the UK who still have large extended families back in Afghanistan and who could be forced into doing something they should not. But guess what. So far there have been no attacks by Afghans on British soil. Why? It is a mystery. News comes from Afghanistan and the recent UN report that the Taleban and the drug trade are intertwined and that now the Taleban, who are mainly Pashtun, are officially in command of an international drug cartel.  News comes from Afghanistan that Taleban drug lords go to Dubai to live high on the hog and gamble and sleep with women and luxuriate in all the that the freedom to consume has to offer, while their footsoldiers, peasant fighters, are deluded and told that they are fighting a patriotic religious war.  And though they are told they are fighting a religious war what really matters to them in tr

Our Collective Caliban

At the risk of seeming digitally provincial, I’m going to illustrate my point with an example from a recent Guardian blog. Michel Ruse, who is apparently a philosopher, suggested that, whilst disagreeing with creationists on all points, and agreeing with Dawkins et al on both their science and philosophy, it might be wiser and more humane (humanist, even) not to vilify the religious as cretinous and incapable of reason. Which seems reasonable, to me. According to many below-the-line responses he is a ‘half-baked’ atheist, ‘one of the more strident and shrill New Apologists’ and, apparently, “needs to get a pair’. And that’s just from the first twenty comments. A recent article by a screenwriter at a US site was titled ‘Why I Won’t Read Your Fucking Screenplay.’ Tough guy. I wonder how his Christmas cards read. I’m going to sound like a maiden aunt dismayed by an unsporting bridge play and can perhaps be accused of needing to ‘get a pair’ myself (although, before you