Skip to main content

Jorge Risquet Valdes Cuba in Africa 1

Che, Leader of the First Patricio Lumumba International Brigade

The history of the second column could not be told before the feats of the First Column, which commander Ernest Che Guevara lead in the land of Patrice Lumumba, were made known.
Only after this episode in the singular life of Che and those who made up the International Brigade in Africa were divulged, was it correct to speak about the modest efforts of his followers in the Second Column, made up of an active reserve, his second front in the valley of that great river which crosses the equatorial waist of the continent.

The publication of Views of Passages on the Revolutionary War: Congo, where the heroic guerrilla relates and analyses this feat, made the present volume both possible and necessary and moreover, it allows us to see the actions of the First Column in their true light; as that first, audacious moment of a larger project whose ultimate objective was to contribute to the victory of our African brothers in the sub-Saharan region in their unequal fight to throw off the colonial yoke and racist oppression.

This strategic project, conceived of by Fidel, Che and Raul, necesitated a quarter of a century of incessant struggle and the efforts of an additional thousand internationalist Cuban combatants over and above the 380 that made up the fighters who formed part of the First and Second Columns. That is to say, one thousand three hundred and eighty soldiers and officers.

In order to create the following text a decision was taken by the minister, and General of the Army, Raul Castro, to set up a committee presided over by Jorge Risquet Valdes and it included the following members:

- Brigadier General Roland Kindelan Blez and Rafael Moracen Limonta.

- Colonel Rene Hernandez Gattarno.

- Medical officials: Rodrigo Alvarez Cambras, Julian Alvarez Blanco, Manuel Jaca Tornes and Rodolfo Puente Ferro.

- Ambassadors: Manuel Normando Agramonte Sanchez and Dario Urra Torriente

- Colonel (retired) Jose Marti Ballester and Lieutenant Colonel (retired) Fernando Galindo Santos.

Therefore, what we offer here to the reader is the fruit of the collective work of the members of the commission, in addition to the contributions of dozens of comrades who have contributed by providing their testimonies and opinions, documents, notes and photos. Jorge Risquet was responsible for compiling and editing the book.

In reality, writing this book started during the years 1965 to 1967, because two thirds of it consists of official documents that were written during those years and that can be found in the archives of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of Cuba, the Information Centre for Defence (CID-FAR), the Ministry of Foreign Relations and the Institute of the History of Cuba.

The veracity of the account and the events described are supported by evidence from these archives, by articles and information published in the newspapers Revolution and Granma, and by the diaries and notes of the combatants. There is also documentation that in some cases has been declassified – in some case it has not – from the embassies in Brazzaville of the German Federal Republic and Great Britain, as well as a range of declassified documents from the US department of State and the CIA. Likewise, there is a copious amount of information available from foreign organs of the press and books written by foreign authors, all of which makes up a large bibliography.

The reader will not find the usual prologue or preface, they are not necessary. The message Commander in Chief, Fidel Castro addresses to the combatants of the Patricio Lumumba Battalion and the speech of the Secretary of the Communist Party of Cuba, Raul Castro on the occasion of the 20th anniversary of the creation of Column one and column Two make that redundant.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

A warm welcome

. Why blog on ARS NOTORIA? I have set up this website,  ARS NOTORIA ,  (the notable art) as an opportunity for like-minded people like you to jot down your thoughts and share them with us on what I hope will be a high profile blog. . ARS NOTORIA is conceived as an outlet: a way for you to get things off your chest, shake those bees out of your bonnet and scratch that itch. The idea is that you do so in a companionable blogging environment, one that that is less structured - freer. Every article you care to write or photograph or picture you care to post will appear on its own page and you are pretty much guaranteed that people will read with interest what you produce and take time to look at what you post. Personal blogs are OK, but what we long for, if we can admit it, are easy-going, loose knit communities: blogging hubs where we can share ideas and pop in and out as frequently, or as seldom, as we like. You will be able to moderate and delete any of the comments made on 

Phil Hall: The Taleban are a drug cartel disguised as an Islamist movement

Truly the Taleban could have arranged as many bombings and terrorists acts as they liked in the UK. There are many Pashtun young men and women in cities in the UK who still have large extended families back in Afghanistan and who could be forced into doing something they should not. But guess what. So far there have been no attacks by Afghans on British soil. Why? It is a mystery. News comes from Afghanistan and the recent UN report that the Taleban and the drug trade are intertwined and that now the Taleban, who are mainly Pashtun, are officially in command of an international drug cartel.  News comes from Afghanistan that Taleban drug lords go to Dubai to live high on the hog and gamble and sleep with women and luxuriate in all the that the freedom to consume has to offer, while their footsoldiers, peasant fighters, are deluded and told that they are fighting a patriotic religious war.  And though they are told they are fighting a religious war what really matters to them in tr

Our Collective Caliban

At the risk of seeming digitally provincial, I’m going to illustrate my point with an example from a recent Guardian blog. Michel Ruse, who is apparently a philosopher, suggested that, whilst disagreeing with creationists on all points, and agreeing with Dawkins et al on both their science and philosophy, it might be wiser and more humane (humanist, even) not to vilify the religious as cretinous and incapable of reason. Which seems reasonable, to me. According to many below-the-line responses he is a ‘half-baked’ atheist, ‘one of the more strident and shrill New Apologists’ and, apparently, “needs to get a pair’. And that’s just from the first twenty comments. A recent article by a screenwriter at a US site was titled ‘Why I Won’t Read Your Fucking Screenplay.’ Tough guy. I wonder how his Christmas cards read. I’m going to sound like a maiden aunt dismayed by an unsporting bridge play and can perhaps be accused of needing to ‘get a pair’ myself (although, before you