Skip to main content

A new Empire made of coups


A Coup-built West African Empire of Seven Countries?



Whose Empire?

With one exception, the seven coloured countries on the map above (Senegal, Burkina Faso, Mali, Côte d'Ivoire, Mauritania, Guinea and Niger, have the following in common:

·         They have been subjected to recent military coups d’état.
·         Each coup has been, or is intended soon to be, made legal by elections.

The exception is Senegal, where the eminence grise, President Abdoulaye Wade, 84 years old or more, has been President for ten years. He is the effective inheritor of the neo-colonialism of Léopold Sédar Senghor, but revised by Wade to conform with the neoliberal “Washington Consensus”.

In Burkina Faso, in 1987, Blaise Compaoré led a coup d’état against his comrade-in-arms, President Thomas Sankara, “Africa’s Che Guevara”. In 1991, Compaoré staged an election and was declared the legal President.

In 1991 Amadou Toumani Touré made a coup d’état in Mali. In 2002 the same Amadou Toumani Touré was elected President.

In Togo, in 2005, the dying President’s son Faure Gnassingbé was installed by a military coup. Elections in 2005 and in 2007 sanctified him in office.

On 23 December 2008, Moussa Dadis Camara seized control of Guinea as the head of a junta. On 3 December 2009, Camara was shot, and subsequently taken to Burkina Faso. In 2010, elections made 72-year-old Alpha Condé, associated with this and with a previous coup, President.

In Mauritania in 2009, there was a coup d’état led by Mohamed Ould Abdel Aziz, converted by elections in 2010 so that Mohamed Ould Abdel Aziz is now President.

A military coup in Niger in February, 2010 put a “Supreme Council for the Restoration of Democracy” in power led by Salou Djibo as President. A Presidential election has been announced for 31 January, while more than 2000 individuals associated with the deposed regime are being accused before the courts.

Côte d'Ivoire

In Côte d'Ivoire in 2002 a coup was attempted against the legitimate President, Laurent Gbagbo, leaving the northern part of the country, adjacent to Burkina Faso, under the control of a rebel army called “Forces Nouvelles”. This army, assembled by Blaise Compaoré, supporting Alassane Ouattara, was never disbanded, although this was a condition for the holding of fresh elections in which Ouattara would be a candidate for President. In the areas where it is present, nearly all the votes were counted for Ouattara.

And there is more…

The above leaves plenty out of account. Other countries in West Africa have neo-colonial regimes sponsored by Washington, or Paris, or both. But what is recorded here should suffice to alert people to certain problems.

All of the coup regimes that were subsequently sanctified by elections are now neo-colonial, and all are accommodated and supported by Abdoulaye Wade and Blaise Compaoré.

There is no coincidence here. The methodology is clear and consistent: Coup d’état is followed by election that delivers the desired result, the sanctification of the coupe and the subordination of another African country to the interests of the “West”. This is as simple a procedure as gang robbery being followed by money-laundering of the proceeds.

Where it is going, is something to think about. What if “AFRICOM” moves in, supported by all these stooge governments? AFRICOM will claim that it has democratic support! Then it can make war in any direction from this vast base territory.

Defend Côte d'Ivoire!

Côte d'Ivoire is not yet defeated and may well be able to stand up to this process and say “They shall not pass!”

This is because Côte d'Ivoire has a mass popular patriotic movement, leadership in depth, a determined President.

Another factor in favour of Côte d'Ivoire is international anti-Imperialist solidarity.

That’s you and me.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

A warm welcome

. Why blog on ARS NOTORIA? I have set up this website,  ARS NOTORIA ,  (the notable art) as an opportunity for like-minded people like you to jot down your thoughts and share them with us on what I hope will be a high profile blog. . ARS NOTORIA is conceived as an outlet: a way for you to get things off your chest, shake those bees out of your bonnet and scratch that itch. The idea is that you do so in a companionable blogging environment, one that that is less structured - freer. Every article you care to write or photograph or picture you care to post will appear on its own page and you are pretty much guaranteed that people will read with interest what you produce and take time to look at what you post. Personal blogs are OK, but what we long for, if we can admit it, are easy-going, loose knit communities: blogging hubs where we can share ideas and pop in and out as frequently, or as seldom, as we like. You will be able to moderate and delete any of the comments made on 

Phil Hall: The Taleban are a drug cartel disguised as an Islamist movement

Truly the Taleban could have arranged as many bombings and terrorists acts as they liked in the UK. There are many Pashtun young men and women in cities in the UK who still have large extended families back in Afghanistan and who could be forced into doing something they should not. But guess what. So far there have been no attacks by Afghans on British soil. Why? It is a mystery. News comes from Afghanistan and the recent UN report that the Taleban and the drug trade are intertwined and that now the Taleban, who are mainly Pashtun, are officially in command of an international drug cartel.  News comes from Afghanistan that Taleban drug lords go to Dubai to live high on the hog and gamble and sleep with women and luxuriate in all the that the freedom to consume has to offer, while their footsoldiers, peasant fighters, are deluded and told that they are fighting a patriotic religious war.  And though they are told they are fighting a religious war what really matters to them in tr

Our Collective Caliban

At the risk of seeming digitally provincial, I’m going to illustrate my point with an example from a recent Guardian blog. Michel Ruse, who is apparently a philosopher, suggested that, whilst disagreeing with creationists on all points, and agreeing with Dawkins et al on both their science and philosophy, it might be wiser and more humane (humanist, even) not to vilify the religious as cretinous and incapable of reason. Which seems reasonable, to me. According to many below-the-line responses he is a ‘half-baked’ atheist, ‘one of the more strident and shrill New Apologists’ and, apparently, “needs to get a pair’. And that’s just from the first twenty comments. A recent article by a screenwriter at a US site was titled ‘Why I Won’t Read Your Fucking Screenplay.’ Tough guy. I wonder how his Christmas cards read. I’m going to sound like a maiden aunt dismayed by an unsporting bridge play and can perhaps be accused of needing to ‘get a pair’ myself (although, before you