Skip to main content

Vince Cable and his big betrayal


Vince Cable, with his coat turned.

By Lucy Hall


Vince Cable, MP for my constituency of Twickenham in southwest London is, or was, a local treasure. Being a Liberal Democrat, he was – until now – naturally inoffensive, and politics aside he is an indisputably charming old man.

He’s moderately pleased left-wingers like me because of his seemingly progressive nature, aligning himself with the left of the Liberal party, and he always seemed to genuinely care about the people he represented.

 All that has changed now of course. From the moment it was discovered he would be sitting in the cabinet of a - lets face it - Conservative government, I felt a little betrayed. When the cuts started, and the Big Society was launched, and the Free Schools and the effective denationalisation of the NHS were proposed, I felt sick just looking at the man.

I have vowed never to vote for him, or the Liberal Democrats again.

Perhaps you think I’m being too harsh. He is still a nice man and I’m sure he still thinks he has the same values. The trouble is he didn’t believe in them enough to turn down the part expected of him in what is proving to be the most rightwing government since Thatcher, perhaps even more so than Thatcher.

The  principles that everyone thought he had based his political career on, fought election after election to try and enact are all too quickly being thrown out the window in favour of pursuing some sort of vacuous personal ambition.
____________________________________________

The thing is, poor old Vince, who looks in genuine pain about the whole thing and is probably writhing with inner turmoil, is hardly alone in his decision. 
____________________________________________

The thing is, poor old Vince, who looks in genuine pain about the whole thing and is probably writhing with inner turmoil, is hardly alone in his decision. Politician after politician has sacrificed their principles all too lightly in favour of some sort of status rise in the Commons. The whole of the New Labour cabinet of the past 13 years is probably a good example (Tony Blair excluded – it is questionable that he ever had any principles, and for that matter Peter Mandelson too). And then of course what happens is you genuinely start believing in these ‘new’ principles, because how else do you live with yourself?

Vince might be telling himself he’s simply a moderating force on a radical Tory Government, but most people have now realised that’s not true. He actually voted for the VAT rise he so adamantly opposed before the election. How do you explain that? It’s starting already, the swapping of principles, the understanding that your former self was 'too naïve' - didn’t know what it was like to be in government.

Now of course, to a certain extent, compromise is an essential tool in politics. You have to accept that not everyone is going to agree with you all the time; that you might actually be wrong about some things. But at the heart of a politician’s actions should be a set of core values. Once these core values are strayed from, it’s dangerous. They become power hungry and will start doing anything to get to the top, and no-one believes them anymore.

 The exception is Tony Benn, a man who has never in his life strayed from what he believes in. Despite what it may have cost him (the leadership of the Labour Party some will say) I believe that people, even those who don’t agree with him politically, respect him more than they respect most modern day politicians put together. In a political climate where most people think politicians are liars and frauds, respect is exactly what they need to earn.

Comments

Unknown said…
And Lucy wrote this well before the charming Twickenham Turncoat chose to dump a large chunk of our bank-made debt onto our non-voting children's shoulders, despite his signed and witnessed promise to do the exact opposite just weeks before. Astute, Lucy.

But you weren't being nearly harsh enough. The charming Cable is an orange booker and at a personal level as committed as the meanest of tories to private profits, abolishing the state and devil take the hindmost free markets. Business Secretary. It's his bag, it's why he got the job.

In genuine pain? I don't think so, Lucy. This is a man acting on principle. Like Blair, he always talked a good left-wing game, traded on "sincerity", became used to deception, lied blatantly when convenient and revealed himself as nasty party to the core on all important matters once in power.

And if his actions and those of his Tory fellow-travellers create more constituents who must beg for help, well, like any decent Mafia Boss, Cable will treat them charmingly.

Popular posts from this blog

A warm welcome

. Why blog on ARS NOTORIA? I have set up this website,  ARS NOTORIA ,  (the notable art) as an opportunity for like-minded people like you to jot down your thoughts and share them with us on what I hope will be a high profile blog. . ARS NOTORIA is conceived as an outlet: a way for you to get things off your chest, shake those bees out of your bonnet and scratch that itch. The idea is that you do so in a companionable blogging environment, one that that is less structured - freer. Every article you care to write or photograph or picture you care to post will appear on its own page and you are pretty much guaranteed that people will read with interest what you produce and take time to look at what you post. Personal blogs are OK, but what we long for, if we can admit it, are easy-going, loose knit communities: blogging hubs where we can share ideas and pop in and out as frequently, or as seldom, as we like. You will be able to moderate and delete any of the comments made on 

Phil Hall: The Taleban are a drug cartel disguised as an Islamist movement

Truly the Taleban could have arranged as many bombings and terrorists acts as they liked in the UK. There are many Pashtun young men and women in cities in the UK who still have large extended families back in Afghanistan and who could be forced into doing something they should not. But guess what. So far there have been no attacks by Afghans on British soil. Why? It is a mystery. News comes from Afghanistan and the recent UN report that the Taleban and the drug trade are intertwined and that now the Taleban, who are mainly Pashtun, are officially in command of an international drug cartel.  News comes from Afghanistan that Taleban drug lords go to Dubai to live high on the hog and gamble and sleep with women and luxuriate in all the that the freedom to consume has to offer, while their footsoldiers, peasant fighters, are deluded and told that they are fighting a patriotic religious war.  And though they are told they are fighting a religious war what really matters to them in tr

Our Collective Caliban

At the risk of seeming digitally provincial, I’m going to illustrate my point with an example from a recent Guardian blog. Michel Ruse, who is apparently a philosopher, suggested that, whilst disagreeing with creationists on all points, and agreeing with Dawkins et al on both their science and philosophy, it might be wiser and more humane (humanist, even) not to vilify the religious as cretinous and incapable of reason. Which seems reasonable, to me. According to many below-the-line responses he is a ‘half-baked’ atheist, ‘one of the more strident and shrill New Apologists’ and, apparently, “needs to get a pair’. And that’s just from the first twenty comments. A recent article by a screenwriter at a US site was titled ‘Why I Won’t Read Your Fucking Screenplay.’ Tough guy. I wonder how his Christmas cards read. I’m going to sound like a maiden aunt dismayed by an unsporting bridge play and can perhaps be accused of needing to ‘get a pair’ myself (although, before you