Skip to main content

The revolting British comprador class

 Let's talk about the British Comprador class
Playboy describes Alinsky as being "one of the great leaders of the non-socialist left". That just about says it all.

We need to revive and re-examine the whole idea of the reality of a comprador class existing in places like Britain. It's workings are laid bare so often and so frequently.

The British comprador class is an unholy melange of British politicians, academics, journalists, city boys and girls and corporate employees all working in the interests the US capitalist metropolis.

There are always the inevitable parallels with the United States: it's lazy thought, isn't it. To import ideologues from the USA and assume that what they have to offer ielevant here too.

Luke Bretherton in the Guardian witters on about Alinsky. Alinsky this, Alinsky that. Where are the lessons drawn from theorists coming from, Belgium, Mexico or Indonesia? No. It's got to be this obsessive and crawly transatlanticism all the bloody time.

That's why we're in such shit right now.

David Cameron dismantelling the welfare state and bringing us into a new dawn of Americana.

As if Micheal Moore never existed. Don't they watch these movies. Haven't those Conservative pricks seen 'Sicko' and 'Bowling for Colombine' and 'Capitalism: a Love Affair?' Why the hell do they think that dismantelling the state will help. Why do we have to move towards the fringe of a nightmarish world of extreme poverty in the city centres and vast wealth concentrated even more in the hands of a few.
 ______________________________________________

The British comprador class is an unholy melange of British politicians, academics, journalists, city boys and girls and corporate employees all working in the interests the US capitalist metropolis.
_______________________________________________

The "hard but necessary medicine" is, in truth, an attack on the state as a means of redistributing wealth. Cameron's bunch don't see why THEY should have to pay so that the proles get educated, don't starve, get cured and retire.

And it's not about the relative poverty that the plebs are willing to put up with, it's about the poverty the establishment is comfortable contemplating. Just how much misery are they willing to have to contemplate in return for less taxes and more profit? Quite a lot.

But we get the influence the other way too.

These incredibly insipid, tentative watered down 'Liberal' ideas from a place called the USA where a President who wants universal health cover is accused of being a communist. Bretherton and Miliband tout the ideas of Saul Alinsky. According to Playboy: Alinsky, a leader of "the non-socialist left". Fucking hell. That just says it all.

The revolting comprador class looking for a golden meal ticket will self-censor and refrain from criticising US imperialism at all costs.

The only way you can understand the complete obsession of the media and the upper levels of academia for anything coming out of the US and the frenzied desire to 'engage' with any half-arsed theory coming out of the US, is by pointing to Piers Morgan.

All the luckiest British journalists and academics will go to US heaven and get paid big bucks. And they must be ever so ever so ever so careful not to say ANYTHING that could ever compromise the possibility of that golden ticket.

A bit like Tony Blair in the last two years of his premiership. He knew which side his bread was buttered on. He compromised British sovreignity in order to get a cushy number promoting US foreign policy objectives after his premiership.

In other countries and at other times that would be called high treason.

And this is the only way I can imagine that such a pathetic, lukewarm, irrelevant set of half formed inappropriate ideas as those proposed by people like Alinsky could ever be put forward here as viable propositions.

By ARSNOTORIA

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

A warm welcome

. Why blog on ARS NOTORIA? I have set up this website,  ARS NOTORIA ,  (the notable art) as an opportunity for like-minded people like you to jot down your thoughts and share them with us on what I hope will be a high profile blog. . ARS NOTORIA is conceived as an outlet: a way for you to get things off your chest, shake those bees out of your bonnet and scratch that itch. The idea is that you do so in a companionable blogging environment, one that that is less structured - freer. Every article you care to write or photograph or picture you care to post will appear on its own page and you are pretty much guaranteed that people will read with interest what you produce and take time to look at what you post. Personal blogs are OK, but what we long for, if we can admit it, are easy-going, loose knit communities: blogging hubs where we can share ideas and pop in and out as frequently, or as seldom, as we like. You will be able to moderate and delete any of the comments made on 

Phil Hall: The Taleban are a drug cartel disguised as an Islamist movement

Truly the Taleban could have arranged as many bombings and terrorists acts as they liked in the UK. There are many Pashtun young men and women in cities in the UK who still have large extended families back in Afghanistan and who could be forced into doing something they should not. But guess what. So far there have been no attacks by Afghans on British soil. Why? It is a mystery. News comes from Afghanistan and the recent UN report that the Taleban and the drug trade are intertwined and that now the Taleban, who are mainly Pashtun, are officially in command of an international drug cartel.  News comes from Afghanistan that Taleban drug lords go to Dubai to live high on the hog and gamble and sleep with women and luxuriate in all the that the freedom to consume has to offer, while their footsoldiers, peasant fighters, are deluded and told that they are fighting a patriotic religious war.  And though they are told they are fighting a religious war what really matters to them in tr

Our Collective Caliban

At the risk of seeming digitally provincial, I’m going to illustrate my point with an example from a recent Guardian blog. Michel Ruse, who is apparently a philosopher, suggested that, whilst disagreeing with creationists on all points, and agreeing with Dawkins et al on both their science and philosophy, it might be wiser and more humane (humanist, even) not to vilify the religious as cretinous and incapable of reason. Which seems reasonable, to me. According to many below-the-line responses he is a ‘half-baked’ atheist, ‘one of the more strident and shrill New Apologists’ and, apparently, “needs to get a pair’. And that’s just from the first twenty comments. A recent article by a screenwriter at a US site was titled ‘Why I Won’t Read Your Fucking Screenplay.’ Tough guy. I wonder how his Christmas cards read. I’m going to sound like a maiden aunt dismayed by an unsporting bridge play and can perhaps be accused of needing to ‘get a pair’ myself (although, before you