Skip to main content

VULGAR, PROFANE AND LEWD: MURGA, THE CANARIES' SPECTACLE OF SATIRE

SANTA CRUZ DE TENERIFE CARNIVAL, Saturday February 6 2010

Joint murga competition winners Los Mamelucos

THOUSANDS crowded into Santa Cruz' waterfront on Saturday for the final of the 50th annual carnival Murga contest.

by JAMES TWEEDIE

The murgas – a half-hour mini-opera with humorous and satirical themes sung to classical, stage-musical and popular tunes – are the most anticipated spectacle of the city's massive carnival.

The packed audience were standing on their wooden folding seats for much of the performance, regardless of which group they were rooting for.

The 12,000 tickets to the final at the open-air Recinto Portuario sold out in three hours on January 13 and were selling on the internet at up to a ten-fold mark-up.

Murgas have their origin in Cadiz in mainland Spain, where the contest still takes place every January. The art form spread to the Canaries, Uruguay and Argentina.

According to one participant, the great popularity of the Murgas goes back to the era of the fascist dictatorship of General Francisco Franco from 1939 to 1975.

During that period the carnival was banned, but the murgas were covertly acted out in the streets, singing things that the regime prohibited to be spoken of.

Since the murgas were legalised they have continued to sing about important social issues that matter to the people, and their popularity has only increased. Every year the Murgas try to innovate and surprise the public.

The other islands of the Canaries and Puerto de la Cruz on Tenerife's north coast have their own murgas, but the chicharreros of Santa Cruz hold their competition to be the highest expression of the art.

Los Diablos Locos took Alexandre Dumas' Three Musketeers as the inspiration for their outfits

Each of the 19 adult murgas and their junior counterparts in Santa Cruz has between 50 and 80 performers. Perhaps one in a hundred of the regional capital's 220,000 residents perform in the murga contest every year.

Most form the chorus who sing almost a cappella, accompanied by drummers and their own trumpets – made of plastic with kazoos attached.

The murgeros and murgeras – still segregated into male and female murgas at the adult level – wear fantastical costumes and make-up, mostly variations on traditional clown styles. The cross-dressing element of pantomime is seemingly obligatory.

Each murga writes and rehearses an introduction, four 'themes' or acts and a finale.

Two themes are performed in the heats and only the eight murgas who made it to the final get to perform their third and fourth acts.

But the real spice of the confection is the critica – the political satire.

Irreverent, vulgar, lewd, profane, scatological and completely politically incorrect, it is reminiscent of the the best traditions of British political caricature and satire from James Gillray in the 18th century to Steve Bell and Martin Rowson today.

But the murgas are such an entrenched and popular tradition that the great and the not-so-good must grin and bear it.

This years' targets were the usual litany of political problems, scandals and the politicians responsible.

The themes of political graft and neglect of public services while ordinary people suffer the effects of La Crisis ran through all the productions.

The hugely unpopular plan to build a rival port to Santa Cruz at Granadilla, the now-defeated Mamotreto development at the city's Las Teresitas public beach and the recent outrage over the PGO by-law – which places 30 per cent of the capital's homes and offices outside of planning permission – were common grist for the mill.

Santa Cruz mayor Miguel Zerolo and Canarian regional president Antonio Castro from the Canarian Coalition party, along with their allies the conservative People's Party's regional and local leaders José Manuel Soria and Ángel Llanos and the newspapers El Dia and Canarias 7 were lampooned.

Not even competition sponsors and Santa Cruz oil refinery owners CEPSA were spared ridicule.

During the three days of preliminary heats at the cavernous indoor Recinto Ferial and the final various topical events were dropped into the murgas, including Friday's barely-detectable earth tremor.

Ni Pico Ni Corto in their prize-winning astronaut costumes

Los Mamelucos (the childish or foolish ones) won the first prize for presentation with their fantasy sylvan spirit costumes.

Second place went to Ni Pico Ni Corto ('I neither peck nor cut' – meaning 'I'm harmless'), with their silver space-suits, with the head of their goose mascot dangling over their codpieces from their belt buckles.

Las Hechizadas (the bewitched) won third place with their more conservative clown costumes.

The first prize for interpretation was awarded to the Los Triqui-Traques (a nonsense-word meaning the noise made by a pair of clackers). Styling themselves the Triqui-Traque Philharmonic, they staged rapid costume, set and musical changes from 70's disco dudes to an orchestra to a ladies synchronised swimming team.

Second and third places went to Los Bambones and the operatically-named La Traviata. Only one women's murga, Clonicas (clones) made it to the final.

Following their performances the murgeros, still wearing their costumes and make-up, partied  with the crowd in the Recinto and the city streets.

The murgas are another pleasant surprise for those looking beyond Tenerife's stereotype of sun, sand, sea, and stitched-up politics.

Los Que Son Son dressed as medieval Scottish warriors, drawing the link between the flags of Tenerife and Scotland

Comments

DomzaNet said…
This is fabulous!
Philip Hall said…
The Murgas look amazing. A sort of people's street theatre no holds barred. Briliant.
Philip Hall said…
Perhaps we should organise them here in London.

Popular posts from this blog

A warm welcome

. Why blog on ARS NOTORIA? I have set up this website,  ARS NOTORIA ,  (the notable art) as an opportunity for like-minded people like you to jot down your thoughts and share them with us on what I hope will be a high profile blog. . ARS NOTORIA is conceived as an outlet: a way for you to get things off your chest, shake those bees out of your bonnet and scratch that itch. The idea is that you do so in a companionable blogging environment, one that that is less structured - freer. Every article you care to write or photograph or picture you care to post will appear on its own page and you are pretty much guaranteed that people will read with interest what you produce and take time to look at what you post. Personal blogs are OK, but what we long for, if we can admit it, are easy-going, loose knit communities: blogging hubs where we can share ideas and pop in and out as frequently, or as seldom, as we like. You will be able to moderate and delete any of the comments made on 

Phil Hall: The Taleban are a drug cartel disguised as an Islamist movement

Truly the Taleban could have arranged as many bombings and terrorists acts as they liked in the UK. There are many Pashtun young men and women in cities in the UK who still have large extended families back in Afghanistan and who could be forced into doing something they should not. But guess what. So far there have been no attacks by Afghans on British soil. Why? It is a mystery. News comes from Afghanistan and the recent UN report that the Taleban and the drug trade are intertwined and that now the Taleban, who are mainly Pashtun, are officially in command of an international drug cartel.  News comes from Afghanistan that Taleban drug lords go to Dubai to live high on the hog and gamble and sleep with women and luxuriate in all the that the freedom to consume has to offer, while their footsoldiers, peasant fighters, are deluded and told that they are fighting a patriotic religious war.  And though they are told they are fighting a religious war what really matters to them in tr

Our Collective Caliban

At the risk of seeming digitally provincial, I’m going to illustrate my point with an example from a recent Guardian blog. Michel Ruse, who is apparently a philosopher, suggested that, whilst disagreeing with creationists on all points, and agreeing with Dawkins et al on both their science and philosophy, it might be wiser and more humane (humanist, even) not to vilify the religious as cretinous and incapable of reason. Which seems reasonable, to me. According to many below-the-line responses he is a ‘half-baked’ atheist, ‘one of the more strident and shrill New Apologists’ and, apparently, “needs to get a pair’. And that’s just from the first twenty comments. A recent article by a screenwriter at a US site was titled ‘Why I Won’t Read Your Fucking Screenplay.’ Tough guy. I wonder how his Christmas cards read. I’m going to sound like a maiden aunt dismayed by an unsporting bridge play and can perhaps be accused of needing to ‘get a pair’ myself (although, before you