Skip to main content

Russell Howard insults Desmond Tutu

Russel Howard insulted Bishop Tutu calling him: "as mad as a rat's arse"



Bishop Desmond Tutu is a South African hero and an internationally respected figure. If he was being joyful and exuberant at the opening ceremony, who is Russel Howard to insult Tutu and call him "as mad as a rat's arse"

Furthermore, his caricature of  Obama as a 'jive' African American answering Cameron on the phone was clearly racist stereotyping and not funny in the least.

Howard looked wired and out of touch. Does he think that coming out with stereotypes about African Americans and calling a hero like Tutu 'as mad as a rat's...' funny?

If you at the BBC are chuckling then I am not chuckling with you. I think you should be ashamed of yourselves for broadcasting such utter shite and expecting us to laugh at it. Moreover, it was an editing decision to leave the insult to Bishop Tutu in, so programme editors share the blame with Howard.

If you think mocking a joyful Bishop Tutu during the South African world cup is funny then that reveals something about you. You lack all perspective and you deserve all the opprobrium coming your way Howard.

Stand aside Russell Brand and Jonathon Ross, we have a new foot-in-mouth champion. In future I will avoid watching Mock the Week and the reason is I think Russell Howard might be a closet racist. Certainly his comments prove he is an incompetent ignoramus lacking basic political, cultural or historical reference points.

 
22:00–22:30

Mock the Week  18th June 2010



  1. The topical comedy show returns with guests Diane Morgan, Milton Jones and Chris Addison.


    Phil Hall

Comments

Anonymous said…
I agree! I did not see the episode that you refer to but have seen several episodes where Russel Howard makes comments, reducing obama to a racial sterotype. One about him mopping up all the oil from the bp spill in his Afro and another describing him as shaft. There seems to be a tendency towards these cheap jokes and I thoroughly resent it. K

Popular posts from this blog

A warm welcome

. Why blog on ARS NOTORIA? I have set up this website,  ARS NOTORIA ,  (the notable art) as an opportunity for like-minded people like you to jot down your thoughts and share them with us on what I hope will be a high profile blog. . ARS NOTORIA is conceived as an outlet: a way for you to get things off your chest, shake those bees out of your bonnet and scratch that itch. The idea is that you do so in a companionable blogging environment, one that that is less structured - freer. Every article you care to write or photograph or picture you care to post will appear on its own page and you are pretty much guaranteed that people will read with interest what you produce and take time to look at what you post. Personal blogs are OK, but what we long for, if we can admit it, are easy-going, loose knit communities: blogging hubs where we can share ideas and pop in and out as frequentl...

Phil Hall: The Taleban are a drug cartel disguised as an Islamist movement

Truly the Taleban could have arranged as many bombings and terrorists acts as they liked in the UK. There are many Pashtun young men and women in cities in the UK who still have large extended families back in Afghanistan and who could be forced into doing something they should not. But guess what. So far there have been no attacks by Afghans on British soil. Why? It is a mystery. News comes from Afghanistan and the recent UN report that the Taleban and the drug trade are intertwined and that now the Taleban, who are mainly Pashtun, are officially in command of an international drug cartel.  News comes from Afghanistan that Taleban drug lords go to Dubai to live high on the hog and gamble and sleep with women and luxuriate in all the that the freedom to consume has to offer, while their footsoldiers, peasant fighters, are deluded and told that they are fighting a patriotic religious war.  And though they are told they are fighting a religious war what really matters to t...

Our Collective Caliban

At the risk of seeming digitally provincial, I’m going to illustrate my point with an example from a recent Guardian blog. Michel Ruse, who is apparently a philosopher, suggested that, whilst disagreeing with creationists on all points, and agreeing with Dawkins et al on both their science and philosophy, it might be wiser and more humane (humanist, even) not to vilify the religious as cretinous and incapable of reason. Which seems reasonable, to me. According to many below-the-line responses he is a ‘half-baked’ atheist, ‘one of the more strident and shrill New Apologists’ and, apparently, “needs to get a pair’. And that’s just from the first twenty comments. A recent article by a screenwriter at a US site was titled ‘Why I Won’t Read Your Fucking Screenplay.’ Tough guy. I wonder how his Christmas cards read. I’m going to sound like a maiden aunt dismayed by an unsporting bridge play and can perhaps be accused of needing to ‘get a pair’ myself (although, before you...