Skip to main content

Lucky Micheals - seed corn of the black South African bourgeoisie

Article by the editor of the SOWETO CHAMBER NEWS in the early 80s is about Lucky Michaels who worked for John Hall, my grandfather, at the Lido hotel in Eikenhoff for a while. I think he ran the Liquor store. John cultivated entrepreneurial enthusiasm in everyone who worked for him and he was an admirer of Dale Carnegie.

He valued hard work above all else and his well known phrase "We'll never die of hunger, will we?" said "Be grateful for what you have and for a rich prosperous and capitalist South Africa."

John was in favour of gradual reform and against revolution and, like many white liberals, above all things he desired the growth of a prosperous, educated black South African middle class to ensure continued peace and prosperity in South Africa. He was irritated and angry at the racist ideology of the Afrikaners which seemed to be preventing the creation of this black South African middle class.

John cultivated people like Lucky Micheals and lucky Micheals was totemic for him. An insurance against revolution and upset. He symbolises the seed corn of the black South African bourgeoisie, on the up long before 1994 and the electoral victory of the ANC -  to which quite a few in the ranks of the ANC have now joined - one way or another.

Unlike my parents, unlike myself, my grandfather would have been be pleased with the way the transition is going in South Africa (crime and corruption notwithstanding) and the triumph of the heirs to Lucky Michaels.

Lucky Michaels' pioneer tobacco dealership

[Picture of Lucky Micheals by a big old American convertible.

Sitting in the same room with Lucky Michaels is like having a bomb in your hands. Better still, it is like meeting a girl on your first date. You simply don't know what to do next.

His aura. His persona. His charm reduces one to a mere spectator in a vast chamber of solid personal achievements.

In a crowded store-room of his Pelican Tobacco Wholesaling in Olrando West, Soweto, he sat on a milk tray, leather jacketed and in jeans. Yet, in more ways than one, he made sitting there look more dignified than any office one can think of. Only Lucky Micheals can do that.

Then there is that voice of his. Deep, clean, sophisticated and proud. Add the tall athletic frame, sprinkle some whiteish powder on the Afro hair and voila! You have a portrait of Mr Michaels.

The name itself conjures up memories of fun. It brings back fond memories of the pelican night club.

Remember the annual pilgrimmage to Zeerusts's Ramosa Reikert where thousands of Lucky's disciples used to flock for a carefree, frolikin' weekend of fun? And of course the man founded the National Taverners Association, the first organised black liqor trader's movement responsible for the repeal of most liquor laws.

It's a name that prompted me, many years ago as a cub reporter, to declare: "I have seen the future of fun. Its name is Lucky Michaels."

Many years of creating fun, many years of knocking unapologetically on the door of "the system" , fighting for Black rights and many years of being in the spotlight have mellowed Michaels a bit. But the mind is still sharp. The business acumen is still there. So is "the art of making a deal", as Donald Trump would say.

Mr Lucky Micheals the businessman recently became the first Black to be awarded the "rights" to run a tobacco wholesale company and he is already puffing his way to the bank.

"Not necessarily," he said, "But of course as a tobacco wholesaler, recession wouldn't affect me as it affects other businesses. People smoke, recession or no recession. Don't they?"

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

A warm welcome

. Why blog on ARS NOTORIA? I have set up this website,  ARS NOTORIA ,  (the notable art) as an opportunity for like-minded people like you to jot down your thoughts and share them with us on what I hope will be a high profile blog. . ARS NOTORIA is conceived as an outlet: a way for you to get things off your chest, shake those bees out of your bonnet and scratch that itch. The idea is that you do so in a companionable blogging environment, one that that is less structured - freer. Every article you care to write or photograph or picture you care to post will appear on its own page and you are pretty much guaranteed that people will read with interest what you produce and take time to look at what you post. Personal blogs are OK, but what we long for, if we can admit it, are easy-going, loose knit communities: blogging hubs where we can share ideas and pop in and out as frequently, or as seldom, as we like. You will be able to moderate and delete any of the comments made on 

Phil Hall: The Taleban are a drug cartel disguised as an Islamist movement

Truly the Taleban could have arranged as many bombings and terrorists acts as they liked in the UK. There are many Pashtun young men and women in cities in the UK who still have large extended families back in Afghanistan and who could be forced into doing something they should not. But guess what. So far there have been no attacks by Afghans on British soil. Why? It is a mystery. News comes from Afghanistan and the recent UN report that the Taleban and the drug trade are intertwined and that now the Taleban, who are mainly Pashtun, are officially in command of an international drug cartel.  News comes from Afghanistan that Taleban drug lords go to Dubai to live high on the hog and gamble and sleep with women and luxuriate in all the that the freedom to consume has to offer, while their footsoldiers, peasant fighters, are deluded and told that they are fighting a patriotic religious war.  And though they are told they are fighting a religious war what really matters to them in tr

Our Collective Caliban

At the risk of seeming digitally provincial, I’m going to illustrate my point with an example from a recent Guardian blog. Michel Ruse, who is apparently a philosopher, suggested that, whilst disagreeing with creationists on all points, and agreeing with Dawkins et al on both their science and philosophy, it might be wiser and more humane (humanist, even) not to vilify the religious as cretinous and incapable of reason. Which seems reasonable, to me. According to many below-the-line responses he is a ‘half-baked’ atheist, ‘one of the more strident and shrill New Apologists’ and, apparently, “needs to get a pair’. And that’s just from the first twenty comments. A recent article by a screenwriter at a US site was titled ‘Why I Won’t Read Your Fucking Screenplay.’ Tough guy. I wonder how his Christmas cards read. I’m going to sound like a maiden aunt dismayed by an unsporting bridge play and can perhaps be accused of needing to ‘get a pair’ myself (although, before you