Skip to main content

Will Lib Dem leaders sacrifice policy for a Tory pact and personal ambition?

Orange ambition is travelling blind


Clegg and Cable: principles as thinly spread as a smear of paint?



It is inconceivable that the Liberal Democrats can do a deal with the Conservative party without losing an historic opportunity to change the electoral system and making unacceptable compromises on all of their policies.

Some of the Central policies of the Liberal Democrats are:

1. Introducing a system of Proportional representation  

(The Tories are against this as it would establish a natural coalition of the left which would not easily change.)

2. Closer ties with Europe

(The Tories are dead set against closer ties with Europe.)

3. Getting rid of Trident

(The Tories are dead set against this.)

4. Normalising the situation of long stay immigrants

(The Tories are dead set against this.)

5. Not introducing Tory style cuts


(The Tories want to start cutting public spending drastically including 6 billion from education.)

6. Against nuclear power

(The Tories are fully in favour of nuclear power.)

7. Against fox hunting

(The majority of Tories are passionately in favour of fox hunting.)

8. Cutting class sizes

(The Tories will take 6 billion out of education and end the school building programme.)

9. Reducing the cost of university education and scrapping fees

(The Tories will allow universities the freedom to set their own fees.)

10. More tax for the rich and less for the poor

(The Tories want to provide tax loopholes for the rich: e.g. raising the inheritance tax.)

11. Strong Obama style regulation for the City


(The Tories want only symbolic punishments and light touch regulation of the bankers.)


12. A dignified distance from the United States foreign policy

(The Tories are Atlanticists to the core.)

Will personal ambition lead to alliance with the Tories and lead to the destruction of at least 80% of the Liberal Democratic platform? Worse. Will the Liberal Democrats lose this historical opportunity for electoral reform as a result of the personal ambition of their leaders?

For Clegg and Cable to ally themselves with the Conservatives is purely and simply a case of personal ambition trumping any principles the Liberal Democrats are supposed to hold. How else can you explain an alliance with a Conservative party that seems to be diametrically opposed to the majority of the Liberal Democrats' key policies?

I think it is highly unlikely that the Liberal Democrats can make an alliance with the Conservatives. Unless the Conservatives, like starved political rats hungering for power, offer a referendum on proportional representation which they later renege on.

If the Conservatives do offer proportional representation, they will lock themselves out of power. A natural coalition of the centre left will take shape. It's not in their long term self interest. With proportional representation the Conservatives would never have been able to form a government in the last 63 years.

The truth is that Nick Clegg and Vincent Cable are wasting time. The Tories can't offer them what their party must have.  If the impending economic crisis is as severe as they say then they should stop messing about. They should behave responsibly, put aside this very unseemly personal ambition and form a coalition with Labour and the SNP and Plaid Cymru in double quick time.

The role of Michael Portillo as the arch shmoozer and slippery PR man for the Lib Dem Tory pact should be noted by everybody. The way the crisis in Greece is being manipulated in this sleazy way by the Tories, and Portillo especially, reminds me of a basic technique employed by time share salesmen and used car salesmen everywhere. Create a convincing and urgent need to make an immediate decision.

The Tories hope rests on the Tory press hounding Brown out of Downing Street, Brown accepting a minority Conservative government. An election re-run with the hope of a working Conservative majority in six months and all hope of changing the electoral system lost.

Clegg and Cable can't be that stupid and immoral, can they? What are they doing negotiating with Cameron? What's he doing to them? Is he tickling their tummies? Is he showing them visions of sugar plums and fairies? Can the offer of power corrupt so quickly? And what will their party say when they come home smelling a little blue? Will the Lib Dem leaders find the door triple locked?

Comments

Heidi said…
It may seem like a small issue to many of the electorate, the issue of fox hunting but it is absolutely essential that the country does not let Cameron get his own way on this issue. Nick Clegg has admitted that after hearing that 75% of the country are against a repeal he would support that 75%, Cameron is obviously dead set against this. His entire campaign has treated the issue of Hunting with hounds in an incredibly blase manner almost to the extent where many believe it may not even be repealed but this is not true, he has had a hidden agenda throughout the entire campaign. The man is not to be trusted, lets hope Clegg stands up for the 75% like he said he would. In the meantime, please Campaign for Decency http://www.campaignfordecency.org.uk/

Popular posts from this blog

A warm welcome

. Why blog on ARS NOTORIA? I have set up this website,  ARS NOTORIA ,  (the notable art) as an opportunity for like-minded people like you to jot down your thoughts and share them with us on what I hope will be a high profile blog. . ARS NOTORIA is conceived as an outlet: a way for you to get things off your chest, shake those bees out of your bonnet and scratch that itch. The idea is that you do so in a companionable blogging environment, one that that is less structured - freer. Every article you care to write or photograph or picture you care to post will appear on its own page and you are pretty much guaranteed that people will read with interest what you produce and take time to look at what you post. Personal blogs are OK, but what we long for, if we can admit it, are easy-going, loose knit communities: blogging hubs where we can share ideas and pop in and out as frequently, or as seldom, as we like. You will be able to moderate and delete any of the comments made on 

Phil Hall: The Taleban are a drug cartel disguised as an Islamist movement

Truly the Taleban could have arranged as many bombings and terrorists acts as they liked in the UK. There are many Pashtun young men and women in cities in the UK who still have large extended families back in Afghanistan and who could be forced into doing something they should not. But guess what. So far there have been no attacks by Afghans on British soil. Why? It is a mystery. News comes from Afghanistan and the recent UN report that the Taleban and the drug trade are intertwined and that now the Taleban, who are mainly Pashtun, are officially in command of an international drug cartel.  News comes from Afghanistan that Taleban drug lords go to Dubai to live high on the hog and gamble and sleep with women and luxuriate in all the that the freedom to consume has to offer, while their footsoldiers, peasant fighters, are deluded and told that they are fighting a patriotic religious war.  And though they are told they are fighting a religious war what really matters to them in tr

Our Collective Caliban

At the risk of seeming digitally provincial, I’m going to illustrate my point with an example from a recent Guardian blog. Michel Ruse, who is apparently a philosopher, suggested that, whilst disagreeing with creationists on all points, and agreeing with Dawkins et al on both their science and philosophy, it might be wiser and more humane (humanist, even) not to vilify the religious as cretinous and incapable of reason. Which seems reasonable, to me. According to many below-the-line responses he is a ‘half-baked’ atheist, ‘one of the more strident and shrill New Apologists’ and, apparently, “needs to get a pair’. And that’s just from the first twenty comments. A recent article by a screenwriter at a US site was titled ‘Why I Won’t Read Your Fucking Screenplay.’ Tough guy. I wonder how his Christmas cards read. I’m going to sound like a maiden aunt dismayed by an unsporting bridge play and can perhaps be accused of needing to ‘get a pair’ myself (although, before you