Skip to main content

Government of national unity in the UK

Will there be a government of National Unity in the UK in 2010?



Clement Attlee and Churchill formed a Lab Tory goverment of national unity

What are the possibilities of a government of national unity? What would a government of national unity look like? Clearly we are not in a crisis deep enough to warrant an alliance of all the parties. This is not the second World War. This is not the great depression, that the oleaginous Micheal Portillo would have us think it is in order to force a Tory- Lib Dem coalition.

Could a government of national unity be one possible outcome of the current negotiations in Whitehall? Well perhaps it could. It could because a temporary government of national unity would be the best way for Labour and the Tories to press the reset button and rid themselves of the prospect of true proportional representation.

You can imagine that the agreement to reform the electoral system needs cross party agreement. No cobbled together majority, progressive or Tory could hold up and push through proportional representation without a three line whip.

Even then it might not happen. For this reason a government of national unity with Labour, Tory and Liberal Democrat participating might be the expedient choice. It would allow Labour time to front a new leader and the Liberal Democrat influence would be eradicated.  Both Tory and Labour would be able to compete against each again other with minor adjustments, in year or so. The danger of proportional representation safely past them.

However, in the end, this all seems extremely unlikely because national unity governments are built through national emergencies rather than internal conspiracy.

Reflecting again on the question of a government of national unity, wouldn’t the only government to unite Britain itself be a progressive alliance incorporating nationalist aspirations. This is eminently realisable in a Lib/ Lab and nationalist coalition. We would then have a government that could claim legitimacy throughout the UK.

Could a Tory minority party in a deal with the Lib Dems ever claim to be national? It couldn’t! The Tories are only an English party.



Clearly a progressive coalition is feasible. The SNP would join and so would Plaid Cymru.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

A warm welcome

. Why blog on ARS NOTORIA? I have set up this website,  ARS NOTORIA ,  (the notable art) as an opportunity for like-minded people like you to jot down your thoughts and share them with us on what I hope will be a high profile blog. . ARS NOTORIA is conceived as an outlet: a way for you to get things off your chest, shake those bees out of your bonnet and scratch that itch. The idea is that you do so in a companionable blogging environment, one that that is less structured - freer. Every article you care to write or photograph or picture you care to post will appear on its own page and you are pretty much guaranteed that people will read with interest what you produce and take time to look at what you post. Personal blogs are OK, but what we long for, if we can admit it, are easy-going, loose knit communities: blogging hubs where we can share ideas and pop in and out as frequently, or as seldom, as we like. You will be able to moderate and delete any of the comments made on 

Phil Hall: The Taleban are a drug cartel disguised as an Islamist movement

Truly the Taleban could have arranged as many bombings and terrorists acts as they liked in the UK. There are many Pashtun young men and women in cities in the UK who still have large extended families back in Afghanistan and who could be forced into doing something they should not. But guess what. So far there have been no attacks by Afghans on British soil. Why? It is a mystery. News comes from Afghanistan and the recent UN report that the Taleban and the drug trade are intertwined and that now the Taleban, who are mainly Pashtun, are officially in command of an international drug cartel.  News comes from Afghanistan that Taleban drug lords go to Dubai to live high on the hog and gamble and sleep with women and luxuriate in all the that the freedom to consume has to offer, while their footsoldiers, peasant fighters, are deluded and told that they are fighting a patriotic religious war.  And though they are told they are fighting a religious war what really matters to them in tr

Our Collective Caliban

At the risk of seeming digitally provincial, I’m going to illustrate my point with an example from a recent Guardian blog. Michel Ruse, who is apparently a philosopher, suggested that, whilst disagreeing with creationists on all points, and agreeing with Dawkins et al on both their science and philosophy, it might be wiser and more humane (humanist, even) not to vilify the religious as cretinous and incapable of reason. Which seems reasonable, to me. According to many below-the-line responses he is a ‘half-baked’ atheist, ‘one of the more strident and shrill New Apologists’ and, apparently, “needs to get a pair’. And that’s just from the first twenty comments. A recent article by a screenwriter at a US site was titled ‘Why I Won’t Read Your Fucking Screenplay.’ Tough guy. I wonder how his Christmas cards read. I’m going to sound like a maiden aunt dismayed by an unsporting bridge play and can perhaps be accused of needing to ‘get a pair’ myself (although, before you