Skip to main content

A coalition with SNP, DUP and Plaid Cymru is a national solution

Since when have Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland been insignificant?

The Tory Party is not really a national party.

Why are the parties of Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland referred to as small parties when the possibility of a Lib/Lab pact containing other non English parties is mentioned. These parties aren’t small they are significant parties representing major elements of our national identity.

You also hear the argument that they would insist on less budget cuts than will be faced in England as their price for cooperation. Of course they would. That is, after all, part of the national deal that underpins the modern Union.

Centuries ago England acquired the other nation states of Britain in a rather old fashioned and direct kind of way that is mercifully no longer acceptable. That reality shaped a by-and-large communal culture, language and outlook. That is not to say there are significant differences. There are.

________________________________________

If you think about it though, isn’t the idea of a Lib / Lab coalition a golden opportunity to reconnect the politics of Britain in the largest sense?
________________________________________

But is that the only reason that keeps the Union together in the 21’st century? Of course not. It is also held together with the unwritten promise that the wealthiest of all British nationalities, England, would provide protection for the smaller populated Northern Ireland, Scotland and Wales. All they would therefore be asking for in a coalition would be a reinforcement of this understanding in these most uncertain economic times.

If you think about it though, isn’t the idea of a Lib / Lab coalition a golden opportunity to reconnect the politics of Britain in the largest sense. For decades the rule of the country by one single minority party after another has meant that politics in general has been distorted by the English marginals that make the first past the post system tick.

This then could be the chance to move our collective national politics forward.

By Mark in History

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

A warm welcome

. Why blog on ARS NOTORIA? I have set up this website,  ARS NOTORIA ,  (the notable art) as an opportunity for like-minded people like you to jot down your thoughts and share them with us on what I hope will be a high profile blog. . ARS NOTORIA is conceived as an outlet: a way for you to get things off your chest, shake those bees out of your bonnet and scratch that itch. The idea is that you do so in a companionable blogging environment, one that that is less structured - freer. Every article you care to write or photograph or picture you care to post will appear on its own page and you are pretty much guaranteed that people will read with interest what you produce and take time to look at what you post. Personal blogs are OK, but what we long for, if we can admit it, are easy-going, loose knit communities: blogging hubs where we can share ideas and pop in and out as frequentl...

Phil Hall: The Taleban are a drug cartel disguised as an Islamist movement

Truly the Taleban could have arranged as many bombings and terrorists acts as they liked in the UK. There are many Pashtun young men and women in cities in the UK who still have large extended families back in Afghanistan and who could be forced into doing something they should not. But guess what. So far there have been no attacks by Afghans on British soil. Why? It is a mystery. News comes from Afghanistan and the recent UN report that the Taleban and the drug trade are intertwined and that now the Taleban, who are mainly Pashtun, are officially in command of an international drug cartel.  News comes from Afghanistan that Taleban drug lords go to Dubai to live high on the hog and gamble and sleep with women and luxuriate in all the that the freedom to consume has to offer, while their footsoldiers, peasant fighters, are deluded and told that they are fighting a patriotic religious war.  And though they are told they are fighting a religious war what really matters to t...

Our Collective Caliban

At the risk of seeming digitally provincial, I’m going to illustrate my point with an example from a recent Guardian blog. Michel Ruse, who is apparently a philosopher, suggested that, whilst disagreeing with creationists on all points, and agreeing with Dawkins et al on both their science and philosophy, it might be wiser and more humane (humanist, even) not to vilify the religious as cretinous and incapable of reason. Which seems reasonable, to me. According to many below-the-line responses he is a ‘half-baked’ atheist, ‘one of the more strident and shrill New Apologists’ and, apparently, “needs to get a pair’. And that’s just from the first twenty comments. A recent article by a screenwriter at a US site was titled ‘Why I Won’t Read Your Fucking Screenplay.’ Tough guy. I wonder how his Christmas cards read. I’m going to sound like a maiden aunt dismayed by an unsporting bridge play and can perhaps be accused of needing to ‘get a pair’ myself (although, before you...