Skip to main content

Comment is beached.

Georgina, did you lose your nerve?



"Of course it's (Comment is Free) developed", Picture by Taramarsden


Dear Georgina,

I read your piece in the Guardian today on the Guardian comment website, and it made me want to chip in.

In my opinion, with the exception of CIF Belief,  CIF lost its nerve. It needed intellectual leadership and instead got the cycling editor, Matt Seaton. As a result, CIF now reads like a tabloid agony column. CIF has drifted into the shallows and unless you and Emily Bell alter its course CIF will soon be beached and it will require an expensive re-launch or binning.

Opinion writing from CIF's regular stable of sanitised, unscintillating, middle-of-the-roaders now sounds arch, insincere and even ridiculous. Again, with the exception of some of the writers on CIF Belief.

How can writers who dedicate themselves to trying not to rock the boat come up with forthright and uncompromised opinions. Can't be done. And of course the last refuge of the insipid is going to be identity politics, ecology, religion and civil liberties.
On CIF now complex issues are constantly over-simplified to attract "customers". The CIF blogs are written more to attract clickage than co-creation. They are aimed at satisfying the "consumer needs of your online audience for content", rather than at encouraging Guaradian readers to be participants and co-creators. But doesn't clickage, on its own as measurement of success, often torpedo informed opinion?
One twee and inconsequential blog is comissioned after another on CIF these days by two of your comissioning editors. Meanwhile, the Tory viral campaigners seem to have been given free reign; perhaps because they brush up nice, perhaps their Ashcroft sponsored clickage is so valued by your marketing department.

The first versions of CiF were superior to the present one. You should have held a steady course. You were doing the right thing and going in the right direction. But you didn't and your article was not celebratory at all. It was a small and uncertain little thing tucked away inside the paper. The Guardian sent in the marketeers and you took the decision to to "sanitise" and market CIF and so you hired a couple of hacks to do so: Matt Seaton and Ros Taylor.

Georgina, look at the result. Hasn't CIF turned into an irrelevant mess? The lesson we should all learn from the CIF experience is that the bland and the fatuous can be poison.
And it will all have been Swri ya Alan Rushbridger, Shwri yangu and Swri ya Matt Seaton.

All the same.

My best wishes to you.




Phil Hall


(I've added to the open letter I sent Georgina. CIF editors are free to comment if they dare.)
__________________________________________




Phil

Sorry - but I don't accept your analysis or your conclusion. I've no idea what you mean about "sending in the marketeers", or "sanitising Cif". Of course it's developed, and I'm sorry that you don't like it any more because you were an early reader and poster.

But I suppose that's the thing about the internet - we may have lost you as a contributor, but hopefully you've found somewhere else that's more to your taste.


Best wishes

Georgina


_____________________________________________


Georgina,


Well, thank you for answering.


Of course, though I met you briefly, I do recall the meet up with Linda and I remember you and your kindnesses with regards to my parents. For that thank you again and thank you and Linda. I remember.

However, I brought my energy to CIF and creativity to CIF, and I am sorry to say, with a few exceptions I think I wasted it.

And that does annoy me rather a lot.




Phil

_________________________________

And another thing:

And by the way, it seems that the former Ambassador Craig Murray agrees with me. He's thinking of suing the Guardian over CIF's treatment of him. I am not making these comments out of a naive sense of what should happen. These criticisms are supported by those of an expert in the medium of Internet publishing.

As I commented to another friend, and former Editor himself:

 "I think Matt Seaton probably got the job at CIF because he was a workaday journalist and a seemingly balanced, hardworking and pleasant creature, who knew how to tout his fairness to Georgina et al. He probably also waxed on eloquently about identity politics. In other words, he was the wrong man for the Job. How can someone who is essentially just a hack and a wet blanket be in charge of fomenting debate?"

Comments

dan pearce said…
I completely agree, Phil.
CIF has lost its bite, probably because The Guardian has become an anodyne rag peddling politics lite- carefully sticking to the middle of the road and not rocking any boats.
Shame.

Popular posts from this blog

A warm welcome

. Why blog on ARS NOTORIA? I have set up this website,  ARS NOTORIA ,  (the notable art) as an opportunity for like-minded people like you to jot down your thoughts and share them with us on what I hope will be a high profile blog. . ARS NOTORIA is conceived as an outlet: a way for you to get things off your chest, shake those bees out of your bonnet and scratch that itch. The idea is that you do so in a companionable blogging environment, one that that is less structured - freer. Every article you care to write or photograph or picture you care to post will appear on its own page and you are pretty much guaranteed that people will read with interest what you produce and take time to look at what you post. Personal blogs are OK, but what we long for, if we can admit it, are easy-going, loose knit communities: blogging hubs where we can share ideas and pop in and out as frequentl...

Phil Hall: The Taleban are a drug cartel disguised as an Islamist movement

Truly the Taleban could have arranged as many bombings and terrorists acts as they liked in the UK. There are many Pashtun young men and women in cities in the UK who still have large extended families back in Afghanistan and who could be forced into doing something they should not. But guess what. So far there have been no attacks by Afghans on British soil. Why? It is a mystery. News comes from Afghanistan and the recent UN report that the Taleban and the drug trade are intertwined and that now the Taleban, who are mainly Pashtun, are officially in command of an international drug cartel.  News comes from Afghanistan that Taleban drug lords go to Dubai to live high on the hog and gamble and sleep with women and luxuriate in all the that the freedom to consume has to offer, while their footsoldiers, peasant fighters, are deluded and told that they are fighting a patriotic religious war.  And though they are told they are fighting a religious war what really matters to t...

Our Collective Caliban

At the risk of seeming digitally provincial, I’m going to illustrate my point with an example from a recent Guardian blog. Michel Ruse, who is apparently a philosopher, suggested that, whilst disagreeing with creationists on all points, and agreeing with Dawkins et al on both their science and philosophy, it might be wiser and more humane (humanist, even) not to vilify the religious as cretinous and incapable of reason. Which seems reasonable, to me. According to many below-the-line responses he is a ‘half-baked’ atheist, ‘one of the more strident and shrill New Apologists’ and, apparently, “needs to get a pair’. And that’s just from the first twenty comments. A recent article by a screenwriter at a US site was titled ‘Why I Won’t Read Your Fucking Screenplay.’ Tough guy. I wonder how his Christmas cards read. I’m going to sound like a maiden aunt dismayed by an unsporting bridge play and can perhaps be accused of needing to ‘get a pair’ myself (although, before you...