Skip to main content

ECOLOGISTS RALLY FOR AT-RISK SPECIES


SANTA CRUZ DE TENERIFE, Saturday March 6 2010
HUNDREDS protested against proposed reductions to the Canaries' endangered species list in the capital Santa Cruz on Saturday.
by JAMES TWEEDIE
The demonstration organised by environmental campaigners Ben Magec – Ecologists in Action took the form of a murga – the satirical pantomime-opera popular in the Canaries since the time of fascist dictator Francisco Franco.
The festivities were led by one member of the group (pictured) wearing a giant caricature mask of Canarian minister for the environment Domingo Berriel.
It was purposely held in the city's Plaza Militar, opposite the offices of the Canarian Coalition (CC) political party – one half of the regional governing alliance with the conservative Popular Party and which proposed reducing by roughly half the archipelago's Catalogue of Endangered Species.
Ben Magec Tenerife spokesman Fran Castro accused the Canarian government of deleting endangered flora and fauna from the list to clear the way for planned roads, railways, a rival port to Santa Cruz in southern Granadilla and a golf course in the neighbouring island of La Palma.
He reiterated the group's demand that the broader scientific community – not only government advisers – be consulted on the composition of the proposed new catalogue.
The demonstration was supported by the Assembly for Tenerife (AxT), an umbrella group of community, left-wing and green organisations.
AxT has led opposition to the unpopular Playa Teresitas Mamotreto development and the PGO planning law in the capital and the Granadilla port development, organising protests of tens of thousands of people.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

A warm welcome

. Why blog on ARS NOTORIA? I have set up this website,  ARS NOTORIA ,  (the notable art) as an opportunity for like-minded people like you to jot down your thoughts and share them with us on what I hope will be a high profile blog. . ARS NOTORIA is conceived as an outlet: a way for you to get things off your chest, shake those bees out of your bonnet and scratch that itch. The idea is that you do so in a companionable blogging environment, one that that is less structured - freer. Every article you care to write or photograph or picture you care to post will appear on its own page and you are pretty much guaranteed that people will read with interest what you produce and take time to look at what you post. Personal blogs are OK, but what we long for, if we can admit it, are easy-going, loose knit communities: blogging hubs where we can share ideas and pop in and out as frequently, or as seldom, as we like. You will be able to moderate and delete any of the comments made on 
6 comments
Read more

Phil Hall: The Taleban are a drug cartel disguised as an Islamist movement

Truly the Taleban could have arranged as many bombings and terrorists acts as they liked in the UK. There are many Pashtun young men and women in cities in the UK who still have large extended families back in Afghanistan and who could be forced into doing something they should not. But guess what. So far there have been no attacks by Afghans on British soil. Why? It is a mystery. News comes from Afghanistan and the recent UN report that the Taleban and the drug trade are intertwined and that now the Taleban, who are mainly Pashtun, are officially in command of an international drug cartel.  News comes from Afghanistan that Taleban drug lords go to Dubai to live high on the hog and gamble and sleep with women and luxuriate in all the that the freedom to consume has to offer, while their footsoldiers, peasant fighters, are deluded and told that they are fighting a patriotic religious war.  And though they are told they are fighting a religious war what really matters to them in tr
21 comments
Read more

Our Collective Caliban

At the risk of seeming digitally provincial, I’m going to illustrate my point with an example from a recent Guardian blog. Michel Ruse, who is apparently a philosopher, suggested that, whilst disagreeing with creationists on all points, and agreeing with Dawkins et al on both their science and philosophy, it might be wiser and more humane (humanist, even) not to vilify the religious as cretinous and incapable of reason. Which seems reasonable, to me. According to many below-the-line responses he is a ‘half-baked’ atheist, ‘one of the more strident and shrill New Apologists’ and, apparently, “needs to get a pair’. And that’s just from the first twenty comments. A recent article by a screenwriter at a US site was titled ‘Why I Won’t Read Your Fucking Screenplay.’ Tough guy. I wonder how his Christmas cards read. I’m going to sound like a maiden aunt dismayed by an unsporting bridge play and can perhaps be accused of needing to ‘get a pair’ myself (although, before you
14 comments
Read more