Skip to main content

Two, three, many Paul Verryns!












Join

Please join the Friends of Paul Verryn.

If you are on Facebook, search for “Friends of Paul Verryn”. Or click here.


To Join Facebook, go to http://www.facebook.com/. You don’t have to give any more than your name, e-mail address and a password. You can skip all of the other requests for information et cetera if you wish, as I did.

When you are registered, you can use the Facebook Search Box to find “Friends of Paul Verryn”.

Why?

Paul Verryn is being “dealt with” for trying to help the Zimbabweans.

He is being hung out to dry by the Methodist Church that he served for so long.

Paul Verryn is a Christian person who walks the Christian walk.

Way forward

Paul Verryn exercises the option for the poor. He is a liberation-theologist-in-action.

In recent years his mission for the Zimbabweans at the Central Methodist Church in Johannesburg, where he is Bishop (now suspended), is what has caused him trouble, including this latest trouble.


He did not turn away those in need. Others, who could have helped, left him to struggle alone with this problem. Doors were closed to the poor, while his was open.


It is time to share the responsibility, defend the Zimbabweans, and provide for them.

Let Paul Verryn not be crucified alone. Let his work be defended. By doing so, we will also be defending the man. In any case, please join the Friends of Paul Verryn and discuss.

Please pass on this e-mail and/or conscientise your Facebook friends about the Friends of Paul Verryn.

Two, three, many Paul Verryns!

Comments

Philip Hall said…
I am entirely in agreement with you about supporting Paul Verryns, Dom
DomzaNet said…
The Friends of Paul Verryn on Facebook now has 747 "fans". That's in about five days.

Popular posts from this blog

A warm welcome

. Why blog on ARS NOTORIA? I have set up this website,  ARS NOTORIA ,  (the notable art) as an opportunity for like-minded people like you to jot down your thoughts and share them with us on what I hope will be a high profile blog. . ARS NOTORIA is conceived as an outlet: a way for you to get things off your chest, shake those bees out of your bonnet and scratch that itch. The idea is that you do so in a companionable blogging environment, one that that is less structured - freer. Every article you care to write or photograph or picture you care to post will appear on its own page and you are pretty much guaranteed that people will read with interest what you produce and take time to look at what you post. Personal blogs are OK, but what we long for, if we can admit it, are easy-going, loose knit communities: blogging hubs where we can share ideas and pop in and out as frequently, or as seldom, as we like. You will be able to moderate and delete any of the comments made on 

Phil Hall: The Taleban are a drug cartel disguised as an Islamist movement

Truly the Taleban could have arranged as many bombings and terrorists acts as they liked in the UK. There are many Pashtun young men and women in cities in the UK who still have large extended families back in Afghanistan and who could be forced into doing something they should not. But guess what. So far there have been no attacks by Afghans on British soil. Why? It is a mystery. News comes from Afghanistan and the recent UN report that the Taleban and the drug trade are intertwined and that now the Taleban, who are mainly Pashtun, are officially in command of an international drug cartel.  News comes from Afghanistan that Taleban drug lords go to Dubai to live high on the hog and gamble and sleep with women and luxuriate in all the that the freedom to consume has to offer, while their footsoldiers, peasant fighters, are deluded and told that they are fighting a patriotic religious war.  And though they are told they are fighting a religious war what really matters to them in tr

Our Collective Caliban

At the risk of seeming digitally provincial, I’m going to illustrate my point with an example from a recent Guardian blog. Michel Ruse, who is apparently a philosopher, suggested that, whilst disagreeing with creationists on all points, and agreeing with Dawkins et al on both their science and philosophy, it might be wiser and more humane (humanist, even) not to vilify the religious as cretinous and incapable of reason. Which seems reasonable, to me. According to many below-the-line responses he is a ‘half-baked’ atheist, ‘one of the more strident and shrill New Apologists’ and, apparently, “needs to get a pair’. And that’s just from the first twenty comments. A recent article by a screenwriter at a US site was titled ‘Why I Won’t Read Your Fucking Screenplay.’ Tough guy. I wonder how his Christmas cards read. I’m going to sound like a maiden aunt dismayed by an unsporting bridge play and can perhaps be accused of needing to ‘get a pair’ myself (although, before you