Skip to main content

A holiday a long time ago...































Now for our younger viewers
A long time ago I went on holiday to Cuba. I took this shot (once again I have had to take a photo of a paper photo) just off a market square in Havana - I believe they were local prostitutes, but I was unaware at the time, I just loved their expressions, their style, the woman's tough eyes. Hard eyes.

As I said before I am not a political animal, so have no wish to comment on the last posting, but I do remember from my experiences in Cuba (as a holiday maker) the fear of speaking about Castro amongst the ordinary folk, also that the market square had lots of booksellers, but all of the books were about Castro or Che. I also recall being told by our hotel bar man that Coca Cola was imported through Spain, in order to avoid the embargo on American goods (how true this is, who knows). At the time, from my limited experience of the country, it seemed like the stereotypes were not based on myth.

Of course I remember the beauty, the friendliness of the people, the elegance of the old (incongruous) American cars, the run down palaces along the coast/port in Havana, the fanatastic graveyard (main one, can't remember the name - but I think the architect that designed it died just as it was completed and he was the first to be buried there). And of course the feeling of being in a country where history was alive, if that makes any sense. There was so much to admire.

Comments

DomzaNet said…
I must say that I don't like thing of saying "I am not a political animal but here are some pictures of Cuban women and I don't know but I assume they are prostitutes and I remember I was afraid to speak about 'Castro' just like I was afraid of a demo in London on the Embankment and aren't the crumbling palaces and the ancient cars so wonderful".

For God's sake, why is there nobody else here who can stand up against this dreary type of stuff? Is TQB a sacred monster? Why? What's the story here?
Sunday, 10 January, 2010
The Quiet Busker said…
I said to Phil, perhaps I was not the person to contribute to this blog and it appears I was right. I explained I would put up a few photos and add a lighter touch (like Dan Pearce) to the sometimes dry/theoretical political cut and pastings (and postings). I always felt it was probably the wrong arena for me and DomzaNet, whoever that is, is right, so I will cease. No one needs to stand up to me, please remain seated at your PC's and macs.

This is not a sulky, oh I am so offended response, or a cowardly one, it is a pragmatic one. The dreary writing was always on the wall.

Just for the record DomzaNet, I wasn't afraid of talking about Castro, it was the local people.
Sunday, 10 January, 2010
Philip Hall said…
What a shame TQM. Blogging is like this everywhere.

I like your photos. I think, though, that the image of prostitution and Cuba is a very unfortunate one.

The resonances go back to the time of the corrupt regime of Batista.

The phenomenon is an embarrassment to socialists who hold Cuba up as an example to follow.

It many respects it is an example, but not in all respects.
Sunday, 10 January, 2010
DomzaNet said…
"I wasn't afraid of talking about Castro, it was the local people."

How do you know?

Maybe they just didn't trust you politically.

I wouldn't.
Monday, 11 January, 2010
Philip Hall said…
Actually, blown up it's a good picture. Painful to look at, though.
Monday, 11 January, 2010
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

A warm welcome

. Why blog on ARS NOTORIA? I have set up this website,  ARS NOTORIA ,  (the notable art) as an opportunity for like-minded people like you to jot down your thoughts and share them with us on what I hope will be a high profile blog. . ARS NOTORIA is conceived as an outlet: a way for you to get things off your chest, shake those bees out of your bonnet and scratch that itch. The idea is that you do so in a companionable blogging environment, one that that is less structured - freer. Every article you care to write or photograph or picture you care to post will appear on its own page and you are pretty much guaranteed that people will read with interest what you produce and take time to look at what you post. Personal blogs are OK, but what we long for, if we can admit it, are easy-going, loose knit communities: blogging hubs where we can share ideas and pop in and out as frequently, or as seldom, as we like. You will be able to moderate and delete any of the comments made on 
6 comments
Read more

Phil Hall: The Taleban are a drug cartel disguised as an Islamist movement

Truly the Taleban could have arranged as many bombings and terrorists acts as they liked in the UK. There are many Pashtun young men and women in cities in the UK who still have large extended families back in Afghanistan and who could be forced into doing something they should not. But guess what. So far there have been no attacks by Afghans on British soil. Why? It is a mystery. News comes from Afghanistan and the recent UN report that the Taleban and the drug trade are intertwined and that now the Taleban, who are mainly Pashtun, are officially in command of an international drug cartel.  News comes from Afghanistan that Taleban drug lords go to Dubai to live high on the hog and gamble and sleep with women and luxuriate in all the that the freedom to consume has to offer, while their footsoldiers, peasant fighters, are deluded and told that they are fighting a patriotic religious war.  And though they are told they are fighting a religious war what really matters to them in tr
21 comments
Read more

Our Collective Caliban

At the risk of seeming digitally provincial, I’m going to illustrate my point with an example from a recent Guardian blog. Michel Ruse, who is apparently a philosopher, suggested that, whilst disagreeing with creationists on all points, and agreeing with Dawkins et al on both their science and philosophy, it might be wiser and more humane (humanist, even) not to vilify the religious as cretinous and incapable of reason. Which seems reasonable, to me. According to many below-the-line responses he is a ‘half-baked’ atheist, ‘one of the more strident and shrill New Apologists’ and, apparently, “needs to get a pair’. And that’s just from the first twenty comments. A recent article by a screenwriter at a US site was titled ‘Why I Won’t Read Your Fucking Screenplay.’ Tough guy. I wonder how his Christmas cards read. I’m going to sound like a maiden aunt dismayed by an unsporting bridge play and can perhaps be accused of needing to ‘get a pair’ myself (although, before you
14 comments
Read more