Skip to main content

Che the Revolutionary fantasist (from Xuitlacoche)



Che Guevara (Whose photo?)

To give you a little background TQM...

I saw a copy of Che's African diaries about three years ago and was asked to translate them, [In fact I still have them in the original Spanish and intend to read them in their unedited form] but that offer soon faded away. At the time I said I would be honoured to translate the diaries. I am not so sure now. Che's language was dense and circular and confusing in its references, alluding to conversations and events that he didn't specify or detail. If Che was writing for posterity, there was absolutely no sign of it in the Spanish he used. Pure stodge. And he did go through a period of being quite obese.

And then, a few days ago I was chatting to one of the former senior leaders of the African revolutionary and anti-colonial movements and he enlightened me somewhat. He said that he had respected Che's ideas to some extent, but didn't like Che as a person.

According to him, Che had been a latecomer to the Cuban revolution, and without much of a background in Cuban politics. He just got onto the boat with Fidel in order to help swell the numbers. From then on Che was under the impression that all you had to do to start a revolution anywhere in the world was to (figuratively) jump off a boat and start shooting guns into the air. Of course everyone would rally to your standard.

This was a simple minded political philosophy indeed and it was a philosophy that would lead to Che's death in Bolivia on October 9th, 1967, almost exactly 40 years ago.

When the Granma arrived on the coast of Cuba in July, Cubans rallied to the revolutionary cause and what Che did not understand is that this was the result of 30 years of political agitation and preparation by the trade unions and the opposition. Che was under the false impression that the people instantly supported Fidel because they had been swept away in a romance of bullets and uniforms and that, on seeing these brave gun-toting role models, their indignation at the injustices they faced would suddenly find its true revolutionary outlet. He was Argentinian, after all, so what did he understand about Cuban politics? He drew his erroneous conclusions.

The African leader in question told me that Che, and Che's group in Africa, were incredibly arrogant and dismissive about the tactics used by the African freedom fighters. Once, after the African revolutionaries announced that a Portugese plane had been shot down, the Cubans refused to believe it. They refused to believe the Africans were capable of such military feats: "Impossible" they said.

Che and his grouping ordered/asked African revolutionary leaders to go and lead revolutions and anti-colonial struggles in countries that were not their own. And they were politely refused.
So Che was a fantasist who appeals strongly other revolutionary fantasists, to people who like the "poetry" of violent revolution. Che was arrogant and mistaken in his outlook and I quite understand how the African leader in question might say:

- "Well, I respected his ideas to some extent, but didn't like him as a person."

On the other hand, perhaps the Cuban intervention in Angola was partly inspired by Che's romantic internationalism and so there was a silver lining to his weapons fetish and his dark romance of bullets turning into flowers. The Cubans played a crucial part in rolling the South Africans out of Angola and Namibia and, finally, in helping to tumble the regime out of power in South Africa.



Dom commented:

Domza

"When the Granma arrived on the coast of Cuba in July, Cubans rallied to the revolutionary cause".

Well there was actually a massacre, and only a handful made it to the mountains (Sierra Maestra). Years of difficulties followed.

Concerning the Cuban interventions in Africa, there is a new and wonderful film called "Cuba, an African Oddyssey" directed by Jihan el-Tahri made for the BBC.

Phil

But the people did rally to Fidel's cause.

Do you agree with Che's philosophy of exporting revolution?

I don't.

Domza

I think that a phrase like "Che's philosophy of exporting revolution" does not come anywhere close to describing the 26-plus-year history of Cuba's military interventions in Africa, or their consequences. I am not an expert but I had some lucky breaks and I was amazed by what I found out. Among other things, I was fortunate to meet Jorge Risquet and he sent me a his own book, signed for me by himself, called "El segundo frente del Che en el Congo. Historia del batallon Patricio Lumumba". I wish you could translate it for me!

I stashed a couple of things, for example this one here:

http://amadlandawonye.wikispaces.com/Excerpts+in+memory+of+our+Cuban+comrades

There are a lot of things one could say. Che went to the Congo under orders and left under orders. The Cubans learnt very well from that and from the second column (Risquet's) and from Guinea-Bissau; and then they went all the way, as you say, to Namibia and to February, 1990. Jihan al Tahri's film is very subtle about the contrast between the Cubans and the Soviets, and very clear on the final confrontation between the Cubans and the Boers, in which Risquet was once again involved.

Somewhere in the story there is a US tribute to the Cubans along the lines that their African interventions were "one of the most astonishing feats of military projection in history" or words to that effect. I am sure that is correct.

Let me take the opportunity of offering you the thing I am working on at the moment, here: http://amadlandawonye.wikispaces.com/Plug-in+City

Just one more small thing about Che Guevara. I don't think there is anything in the fact that he was Argentinian and not Cuban. There is a long history of Latin American internationalism, even including British internationalists, as mentioned in the interview James Tweedie did with Jeronimo Carrera, stashed here:

http://amadlandawonye.wikispaces.com/Venezuelan+Communist+Jeronimo+Carrera+interviewed+in+Morning+Star

I think what is more to the point is that Che was a white settler child very much like a white South African or Kenyan white settler child. I find that this is a good way for me to understand and appreciate him and to sympathise with him.

Fidel's relationship with Che was very important to Fidel. Fidel's father was a landowner and farmer. Fidel grew up simply, and close to workers, but was not himself poor.

Enrique Orta of the Cuban Embassy here in South Africa gave me a postcard of Fidel as a young man, after the revolution, playing baseball, with a group including black players. Liber Puente Baro, also of the Embassy, later saw the picture on my office wall. Liber explained to me that before the revolution, baseball was an exclusively white sport in Cuba! I had no idea of something like that.

I have come to regard the struggles in Latin America and in Africa as more similar than different, and because of that, to see my own position as a white, or perhaps a creole, in a different way - i.e. as part of a much larger history and tradition.

Comments

DomzaNet said…
Hi Phil,

Did I ever tell you that Jorge Risquet's book can be downloaded in PDF format, in Spanish, from the Internet. If you want it and can't find it there yourself, I should be able find the link somewhere. It might be a much better book to try and translate. It would be great for South Africans among others to have it in English.
Philip Hall said…
"Among other things, I was fortunate to meet Jorge Risquet and he sent me a his own book, signed for me by himself, called "El segundo frente del Che en el Congo. Historia del batallon Patricio Lumumba". I wish you could translate it for me!"

By the way Dom, perhaps I could translate it for you. Is it very long?

I would love to hear more from you about your time in Kenya and the Mau Mau rebellion. Dad said that there was a peculiarly demonic British colonial officer in charge of "rooting out" the Mau Mau. What was his name again?

Also, is it true that Tom Mboya was CIA?

Do you have a copy of the draft of the KPU platform that Dad drafted?

I have a lot of Dad's old stuff from that period.
DomzaNet said…
Hi Phil,

Risquet's book is at:

http://aniversario50.cubava.cu/index.php?option=com_remository&Itemid=0&func=fileinfo&id=4&lang=es

Please read it for me, comrade! It would be a mitzvah to me personally if you would, and told me a little about it.

Concerning the monster of the "Pipeline", the book by Caroline Elkins, "Imperial Reckoning: The Untold Story of Britain’s Gulag in Kenya" (New York: Henry Holt, 2005), might help.

I don't know if Tom Mboya was an "asset". I think he was a proto-bourgeois like many others, the kind that Frantz Fanon wrote about. Why did Mboya have to be CIA as such? What does it mean, anyway? The CIA does not back people for life. Look at Saddam. Look at Plame, for that matter.

I don't think I have the KPU program. Kimani Ndungu might know where to find it. Give me a bit more time.

There's another book called "The Black and the Red", by an actual CIA guy, from the sixties I think, about Kenya. That would be a find if you can get it.
Philip Hall said…
Good tips. There is a guy who is writing a book on that period in Kenyan history and he has been in touch with me about Dad and the KPU and asking for information from me. I haven't found time to go through all Dad's papers, but perhaps he should contact you.

I will give the book you link to a read and then summarise link to it. Not at the moment because I have to finish something, but asap.

BTW TQM is a good egg. I find with lots of poets and musicians that they are scared of being overtly political. I don't know why. The big nonsense is the world of art and potry and music (as in Silvio's song) is that you have to keep politics and aesthetics seperate.

It's the political castrati school of art, poetry and music.

But TQM is a good egg.

Popular posts from this blog

A warm welcome

. Why blog on ARS NOTORIA? I have set up this website,  ARS NOTORIA ,  (the notable art) as an opportunity for like-minded people like you to jot down your thoughts and share them with us on what I hope will be a high profile blog. . ARS NOTORIA is conceived as an outlet: a way for you to get things off your chest, shake those bees out of your bonnet and scratch that itch. The idea is that you do so in a companionable blogging environment, one that that is less structured - freer. Every article you care to write or photograph or picture you care to post will appear on its own page and you are pretty much guaranteed that people will read with interest what you produce and take time to look at what you post. Personal blogs are OK, but what we long for, if we can admit it, are easy-going, loose knit communities: blogging hubs where we can share ideas and pop in and out as frequently, or as seldom, as we like. You will be able to moderate and delete any of the comments made on 

Phil Hall: The Taleban are a drug cartel disguised as an Islamist movement

Truly the Taleban could have arranged as many bombings and terrorists acts as they liked in the UK. There are many Pashtun young men and women in cities in the UK who still have large extended families back in Afghanistan and who could be forced into doing something they should not. But guess what. So far there have been no attacks by Afghans on British soil. Why? It is a mystery. News comes from Afghanistan and the recent UN report that the Taleban and the drug trade are intertwined and that now the Taleban, who are mainly Pashtun, are officially in command of an international drug cartel.  News comes from Afghanistan that Taleban drug lords go to Dubai to live high on the hog and gamble and sleep with women and luxuriate in all the that the freedom to consume has to offer, while their footsoldiers, peasant fighters, are deluded and told that they are fighting a patriotic religious war.  And though they are told they are fighting a religious war what really matters to them in tr

Our Collective Caliban

At the risk of seeming digitally provincial, I’m going to illustrate my point with an example from a recent Guardian blog. Michel Ruse, who is apparently a philosopher, suggested that, whilst disagreeing with creationists on all points, and agreeing with Dawkins et al on both their science and philosophy, it might be wiser and more humane (humanist, even) not to vilify the religious as cretinous and incapable of reason. Which seems reasonable, to me. According to many below-the-line responses he is a ‘half-baked’ atheist, ‘one of the more strident and shrill New Apologists’ and, apparently, “needs to get a pair’. And that’s just from the first twenty comments. A recent article by a screenwriter at a US site was titled ‘Why I Won’t Read Your Fucking Screenplay.’ Tough guy. I wonder how his Christmas cards read. I’m going to sound like a maiden aunt dismayed by an unsporting bridge play and can perhaps be accused of needing to ‘get a pair’ myself (although, before you