When Phil invited me to contribute to this blog I told him I had nothing to offer, that intellectually (and you will probably agree after reading what i have to blog) I was not up to it, I write songs that no one listens to and take photographs that no one looks at, what could I offer? I guess i am preparing for the bright eyes amongst you to lower your expectations, a cheap trick, but an honest one. I said I would give it a go because, I suppose I was flattered.
But what to write? I know Phil is political, a passionate man, a man of many interests, I didn't want to let him down - so, Phil if you are reading this (which I know you will be at some stage) - apologies for lowering the tone.
So, here goes - Yesterday someone said something that made me think in a way I have never thought before. It was so simple. He said that when he and his girlfriend decided to have children they wondered what surname to give their children. They didn't believe in marriage and all its connotations, nor did they like double barreled names (which name would get dropped?). So, like in days of old, they considered changing their name to one that reflected their occupations or where they lived.
I won't say what they chose, but somehow it was a perfect choice. It seemed right. It suited them, and even though I have never met their children, I bet it suits their children. It also made me think of the freedom of such a move. History smacked into the past and left there, a clean slate, no associations, a freshness, a newness, a sense of starting again, a cancelling out of all that has gone before, a clean break, an invention, a rebirth, how refreshing and liberating. A new family. A new future. An end to ancient family feuds.
But what about the past? Family history? Did it hurt those who believed the continuation of the family name was important, that their place, that their ink/digital existence had been threatened by a new and tiny family tree (a seedling). Did it seem disloyal? A slight? A stab in the back?
So reader, what if you decided to change your name? Now. Right now. Change it to suit your occupation, or the place you live? Joseph Journalist? Anthony Twickenham? Andrew Doncaster? Thomas Teddington? Philip New Malden? Lawrence Lawyer? Colin Weatherman? Brian Banker? Janice Insurance? Sue Southampton? William Wimbledon? Roger Public-Relations? Julie Animator? Bernard Biddulph? Nick Racist? John Plasterer? Bob (middle name - the) Builder? Mick Richmond? David Inverness? Simon Welder? Eric Programmer? Alan Administrator? Sharon Marketing? Bob Artist? Daisy Social Worker? Danni X-Factor? Tracy Counsellor?
Try it. How does it make you feel? Does it suit you? If you adopted it, what effect would it have on you? On your future? On your confidence? Your ambition? How people perceived you?
If you are doing a job that you love, that fits, that is right, and you live in a place that you feel secure and happy with, then why not change your name? Go on, give it a go....
Yours, Billy Blog.
Comments
I also like the idea of your preferred honesty which to me indicates humility.
Should have chosen a city for a pseudonym. ;-)
Am posting an account to an older blog as this format doesn't accept my wordpress url.
Thanks & regards
Susan Abraham
http://susanabraham2.wordpress.com
Here is my site, I think!
http://thequietbusker.blogspot.com/
my music one is www.myspace.com/thequietbusker
I know i shouldn't really be leaving this as a comment on my own contribution!
TQB.
Some claim that current surnames are intrinsically misogynist, expunging wives’ identities and genealogical lines (although it was probably a practical way of securing property rights from generation to generation) – and it is also true that some Nordic nations (notably Iceland) construct their surnames from the father’s first name (so the son and daughter of Magnus are Magnusson and Magnusdottir respectively – brother and sister) – but in an enclosed society like Iceland that may work...but this seems like another stride forward for the individual without consideration for tradition, heritage, norms...good job it won’t be taken up...
Tony Truculent
(Second mention of Iceland on the blog so far – we’ll be talking about banks next....)